Talk:California Impressionism

California Plein-Air Revival was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 13 August 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into California Impressionism. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Article needs rewrite[edit]

This article is in need of a rewrite or some serious editing. It repeats the same topics (California Plein-Air Revival) again and again but written four different times by different authors.

I am willing to give a shot at cleaning this up, but I am not expert, just a hobby collector of California impressionists, which is what led me to this page.

ausman (talk) 00:27, 30 Sep 2021 (UTC)

Untitled[edit]

I am working on a project to augment the very short and/or non-existent entries on the subject of California Impressionism, the largest Plein-Air painting movement in history. Initially I will be putting in references at the end of the article which will be numbered only after I have written more. Don't despair, lots of references to be added, this is a very well researched subject.

I can see you're busy improving the article; a couple of tips:

Try to incorporate some of your references as inline-citations, as they're especially important in an article of this size.
Consider using the {{cite}} family of templates to cite your sources, as you'll get a much neater, more consistent standard that way. You can find out the syntax for the template here.
Please remember to sign comments on talk pages such as this one with four tildes ~~~~.

Keep up the good work!

GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 23:44, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References section[edit]

Please note that it's standard practice to have a single references section, and to include the code {{reflist}} or </references> in it to automatically list inline citations, added next to the appropriate sections wrapped in <ref/> tags. Many articles have hundreds of references but only a single section; if you use the cite templates it will be neater regardless. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 00:04, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article title change[edit]

California Plein-Air Painting → California Impressionism – Proposing this be retitled California Impressionism, which is well supported by scholarship [1], and is a recognized sub-section within American Impressionism. Lede will require rewriting, but not difficult. JNW (talk) 12:14, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Visual_arts#California_Plein-Air_Painting czar · · 18:32, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support change...Modernist (talk) 21:19, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support change...Bus stop (talk) 22:22, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support change, as the original proposer. Better term, in that it suggests reference to the most important painters of this genre, from the early 20th century; in much the same way that French Impressionism is preferable to 'French Plein Air Painting'. JNW (talk) 02:19, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I don't have input (right now), but the request should have stayed open for well over 24 hours (usually a week) for others to have a say, if they so choose. czar · · 18:36, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Whichever title this goes by, I'm crystallizing what's problematic about this article, besides the poor sourcing, original research and non-neutral passages. Museum shows and publications use California Impressionism and California Plein Air Painting to refer to the movement that ended in 1930 [2], [3]; I'm not convinced that either term is appropriate for later and contemporary painters, and wonder if adding them isn't piggybacking on an art history term designating another era. I think 'Plein Air Revival' constitutes original research, as I've noted here [4]. The first reference (which I'm about to remove) is to an unpublished manuscript; perhaps it referred to this [5]. I've been suspecting conflict of interest, and while that's another matter, it would help to explain some of this. JNW (talk) 23:50, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on California Impressionism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100613045500/http://arts.pepperdine.edu/museum/mercedes-matter.htm to http://arts.pepperdine.edu/museum/mercedes-matter.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]