Talk:Cannons (house)

Cannons (house) was one of the Art and architecture good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 23, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
March 11, 2024	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Handel

Water Music

The Water Music may have been played first by the Cannons orchestra.

Library

I have added info about librettists who collaborated with Handel at Cannons. The library is still a lacuna.

--Alan (talk) 14:02, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pope year

Could hardly have been satirized by Pope in 1831 or whenever it said because he had been dead for almost a century before that. Date has been removed. (138.16.57.183 (talk) 23:03, 6 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]

It was a typo - should have been 1731, been corrected now. nancy ^(talk) 09:32, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cannons (house)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

I must say, I am impressed with the effort done on this article.

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Nice work. Keep it up!

Handel at Cannons

The amount of detail regarding Handel was starting to overwhelm and the balance of the article was suffering. I have therefore split out the detailed section in to its own article - Handel at Cannons with appropriate attribution. Nancy ^talk 12:20, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

Cannons (house)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is significant uncited material in this 2008 promotion, meaning that it does not meet GA criterion 2b). ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 02:46, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.