Talk:Capgemini

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Business (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Companies (Rated Start-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Computing (Rated Start-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject France / Paris  (Rated Start-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Paris task force.
 

History and Acquisitions[edit]

These lists serve almost identical purposes. I'm not an expert on Company Portal style (which is why I didn't go ahead and make the edit), but it seems that acquisitions should be deleted from the History list OR the Acquisitions list should be deleted outright. Frank MacCrory (talk) 05:01, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

The aquisitions of Cap Gemini only demonstrates the company's ability to spend money to gain market share. The history should also encompass the success of the aquistions and whether the penetration achieved was worth the investment. 24.107.116.39 (talk) 01:14, 11 June 2012 (UTC)Laura Leed
I agree with Frank MacCrory. The same thing crossed my mind as I was editing the article. In my opinion, the acquisitions section is redundant. We should cover the history of the company in the framework of reliable secondary sources. Cheers! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 12:14, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Capgemini. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Question? Archived sources still need to be checked

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:40, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Reducing the article to a stub[edit]

Greetings! The current article mainly consists of large lists, and is impossible to turn into a coherent, eloquent piece of text by these grounds. I'd like to suggest removing the excessive lists, and start re-writing the article on the basis of reliable secondary sources. Mentioning each one of the company's acquisitions hardly seems relevant. Cheers! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 12:23, 20 April 2016 (UTC)