Talk:Cary Cooper

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I'm curious as to why the bibliography lists 10 sources, but the content of the article is only one sentence long. --Cyrus Andiron ^t/_c 12:57, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe because I am creating it now - thanks you have just deleted my talk - reasoniong! Please in future check when articlea are created before being so hasty. Reasoning to follow now - WAIT before posting anything else.--Pandaplodder 13:02, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cary Coopper is one the worlds foremost experts on Organisational Psychology, he was formerly at UMIST business School and now is Professor at Lancaster University Business School.

He is often interviewed by the BBC and ITV news/current affairs. Heis work is quoted alot by management science students.

If he isn't notable then nothing on wiki is!--Pandaplodder 13:06, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's all you had to say. There's no reason to get upset. Generally, articles that are only one sentence long will get nominated for speedy deletion. It really isn't that big of a deal as long as you plan to add more information. I'll remove the tag and you can continue to add more content.

Also, if there is an editing conflict you can still post your material as well. When it happens there wil be two boxes of text on the page. The box on the bottom will have what you typed and the box at the top has what I have typed. If you copy and paste your text in the bottom box and put it under my text in the top box, both of our comments will show up. --Cyrus Andiron ^t/_c 13:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its ok I'm not mad at you, normally I write stuff out on paper beforehand but I'm pushed for time today. This edit conflict happens alot and I don't always get a second edit box?--Pandaplodder 13:21, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It will be at the very bottom of the page. You'll need to scroll to find it. The hard part is fiding what you typed and putting it in the box at the top via copy and paste.--Cyrus Andiron ^t/_c 13:28, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article will take a good couple of weeks to complete, so consider it WIP--Pandaplodder 13:57, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cary Cooper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150617185402/http://www.anxietyuk.org.uk/about-us/whos-who/medical/ to http://www.anxietyuk.org.uk/about-us/whos-who/medical/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:09, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]