Talk:Cathedral of Chihuahua
I beg to differ-the cathedral article was no better than start quality and the archdiocese article no more than a stub. If you felt that the content was weak then you could have re-written it with no problem from me-now, where is the archdiocese material?--Lyricmac (talk) 17:52, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- These articles are stronger apart then together. I have nothing against improving both articles, but I do not believe the merge is helpful.Benkenobi18 (talk) 00:44, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cathedral of Chihuahua. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060209101255/http://www.e-local.gob.mx:80/work/templates/enciclo/chihuahua/Mpios/08019a.htm to http://www.e-local.gob.mx/work/templates/enciclo/chihuahua/Mpios/08019a.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at
You may set the
|checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting
|needhelp= to your help request.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
If you are unable to use these tools, you may set
|needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.