Jump to content

Talk:Ceannt Station Quarter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ceannt Station Quarter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:46, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

[edit]
The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived: outcome was: merge and redirect

I propose to merge the limited content on the original (2007-2012) proposal to the "Developments" section of the Ceannt Station article. And to redirect this title to that section. I propose this because the titular subject of this article does not exist, may never exist, will invariably remain short (and can only be expanded with content on other/loosely-related topics), requires context and background from the other article, and generally because all WP:MERGEREASONs are met. Guliolopez (talk) 11:11, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An AfD could have been an option too, but I do not object against a merge. The Banner talk 11:24, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In all honesty I was tempted to PROD or AfD this. But, having re-looked at the Galway railway station#Developments section (which seems to cover both the original (2007) CIÉ proposal and the later (2020) Edward Holdings proposal just as this article does), it seems reasonable to just merge the two. To address the duplication/overlap/etc. And, while a redirect may not really be called for, its probably uncontroversial to retain one... Guliolopez (talk) 11:29, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
True, and you never know if this dream becomes a reality in the future. The Banner talk 13:06, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Resolved. As it's been a few weeks, and the only input was in support of a merge/redirect, I've gone ahead and merged the related content to the target article/section. And redirected this title to that section. Guliolopez (talk) 15:39, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]