Jump to content

Talk:Celebrant (Australia)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

No merge

[edit]

There is no reason at all to merge this with a larger entry that lists various common Euro-American wedding participants. If anything such an entry should link to this as the main entry.PelleSmith (talk) 14:53, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The Australian Civil Celebrant is genuinely unique and other Western Countries are still struggling to absorb the complex of concepts. (Citizen-Gladiator) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Citizen-Gladiator (talkcontribs) 19:53, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

..and New Zealand

[edit]

This term, celebrant is also used in New Zealand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Galaxyporpoise (talkcontribs) 06:39, 28 February 2010 (UTC) -- I intend to put in a section in on New Zealand as soon as I can find a reliable source. (Citizen-Gladiator) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Citizen-Gladiator (talkcontribs) 19:50, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Celebrant (Australia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:53, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The 1970s was the decade of great social change in Australia

[edit]

The 1960s might have had the Beatles but the 1970s was the decade of great social change. This can be seen in the Australian civil marriage figures.

  • In the 1950s the civil marriage rate rose from 10.35% in 1950 to 11.54% in 1960.
  • In the 1960s the civil marriage rate went from 11.63% in 1961 to a low of 10.63% in 1968 and 10.91% in 1969.

In the 1970s, the civil marriage rate rose from 11.92% in 1970 to 36% in 1979. This rise is far more dramatic than in any succeeding decade.

  • In the 1980s it rose from 36.3% in 1980 to 42.2% in 1989.
  • In the 1990s it rose from 42.1% in 1990 to 51.3$ in 1999.

* From 2000-2010 it rose from 52.8% in 2000 to 66.9% in 2009.

  • From 2010 it rose from 69.2% in 2010 to 79.7% in 2018.

So the rate of change was greatest in the 1970s, followed by the first decade of this century and then this decade, followed by the 1990s and then the 1980s. In contrast to this, the decade of the 1950s was one of a slow rise and most of the 1960s saw a slow fall in the civil marriage rate.

Therefore the evidence points to rapid social change in the 1970s rather than the 1960s. Hence the changed date in the text.

Advertising by Private person

[edit]

4th para under the section "marriage celebrants". "Marriage by independent civil celebrant has spread in other English-speaking countries." This reference / link appears to be advertising by a private person. I did not want to delete it until someone more authoritative has double checked. Is this the right code {{source check}}? Gladiator-Citizen (talk) 07:46, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]