Talk:Cereal Partners Worldwide
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Cereal Partners Worldwide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101101113043/http://www.nestle-cereals.com:80/cpw/company.html to http://www.nestle-cereals.com/cpw/company.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Apolitical
[edit]Is it easier to stay apolitical to the work of Nestle and General Mills? Are their any avenues on the page to discuss the controversy surrounding Nestle and General Mills?
For example, Nestle and General Mills are two of the largest food corporations in the world, and they have been involved in several controversies and scandals over the years. Some of the issues that have been raised against them include:
- The unethical marketing and health risks of baby formula, especially in developing countries.
- The exploitation of water resources and human rights violations in communities where they operate.
- The use of child labor and deforestation in their cocoa supply chains.
- The promotion of unhealthy and processed foods that contribute to obesity and chronic diseases.
- The lobbying and influence on public policies and regulations that favor their interests over the public good.
KnowledgePeaceIntegrity (talk) 01:04, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Stub-Class Food and drink articles
- Unknown-importance Food and drink articles
- WikiProject Food and drink articles
- Stub-Class company articles
- Unknown-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Stub-Class Switzerland articles
- Low-importance Switzerland articles
- All WikiProject Switzerland pages
- Stub-Class Brands articles
- Unknown-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles