Talk:Chappell–Ganguly controversy
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chappell–Ganguly controversy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Chappell–Ganguly controversy appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 March 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Not worth
[edit]Is it just me, or is this topic not worth having a separate artcile for? It reads like an irate Indian cricket follower extensively rehashing a personality clash between a player and his team's coach. There have been literally thousands of these in the history of professional sport.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.101.160.162 (talk • contribs)
- Yes, it passes WP:N, and was highly notable. Do you think I am a Ganguly or Chappell supporter? I'm the author. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- Start-Class India articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject India articles
- Start-Class cricket articles
- Low-importance cricket articles
- Start-Class cricket articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Cricket articles