Talk:Charlie's Angels (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Film (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
 

As well as...[edit]

As well as the main character being regarded as being based on Bill Gates, it's speculated that Corwin was based on Larry Ellison. I think Larry was once asked about the similarity (I think he said he wasn't aware of it), but unfortunately I can't google it. Andjam 10:35, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

The first line in the scene following the high action opening sequence, that features the character played by Drew Barrymore, is "morning Starfish", or something close to that. The line is spoken by the character's temporary boyfriend, who calls her Starfish. "Starfish" is slang for the anal sphincter. Barrymore was positioned, naked, so that her anus would be on view to the boyfriend; and the male actor does, indeed, seem to looking at Barrymore's anus.

game[edit]

any Wikipedia info on the GC/PS2 game that's based on the movie? 85.227.226.235 (talk) 23:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Merge from character articles[edit]

It makes sense to take the PROD'd article on Natalie Cook (Charlie's Angels) and create a short one or two line summary of the character for this article, which would serve to anchor the film series (now at 2 films). --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 13:25, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Also applies to PROD'd Alex Munday. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 22:26, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
...and Dylan Sanders. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 22:29, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

The still used[edit]

There doesn't seem to be any commentary done on that picture. Seems to be more for cosmetic purpose than anything else. Shouldn't that qualify it for deletion? Fixer23 (talk) 23:38, 25 September 2010 (UTC)