This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
I have updated Chloe's birthdate based on an instagram post she made on the 16th February 2019 in which she had the caption "hello adult years" — Preceding unsigned comment added by RoboBongoCuckooCop (talk • contribs) 08:33, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Chloe East has been married for over a year as confirmed on her Instagram & YouTube.[edit]
We need specific sources – What are they? --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:26, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry but she publicly admitted to her marriage, what's specific sources should I set myself then? Unless you want me to go to California's City Hall. BalticBowser (talk) 23:38, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also Google has the dignity to update with the actual facts than Wikipedia, of all places. BalticBowser (talk) 23:39, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Secondary sources are preferred over primary, and per WP:BLPPRIMARY, don't use public records solely to back the marriage. And even more importantly, changing her name in the article must be backed my multiple, high quality, secondary sources, indicating she is using her married name professionally. (Birth name, in the infobox, should definitely not be changed, as your recent edit to the article showed.) MPFitz1968 (talk) 23:45, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes – source cannot violate WP:BLPPRIMARY (so no public records from, say, L.A. County). Also, even it if an WP:ABOUTSELF source is attempted to be used – and, I note, it must be very clear: It can't be something vague, like "Wedded bliss" with a picture – the caption will need to say something like "I got married yesterday." I'm not sure this gets us there, though it's probably close, and is worth discussing.
Note that even if the latter "confirms" the identity of the groom (and I don't see a surname mentioned), it couldn't be used even if he is named (WP:ABOUTSELF strikes again!)... Bottom line – if this was not picked up by something even like Us Weekly or People, it may not make it into an article until a mainstream WP:RS picks up on her marital status. Based on the WP:ABOUTSELF Instagram source, her husband's name does not make it into the article, and as MPFitz1968 states above changing her name absolutely does not. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:56, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This Harper's Bazaar interview, which is linked to from her Instagram account, mentions a husband. Probably that with the WP:ABOUTSELF Instagram would be enough to add her "being married" to the article. But literally no other detail can be added, based on just these. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:12, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, but I'm laughing at the fact that to confirm your marriage on Wikipedia, you need to be backed by those tabloid news sites. I'm sorry, but that's hilariously bullshit. Oh man, maybe next time, I should get an op-ed made in The New York Times to back up my marriage instead from the person's actual social media accounts. Anyways these regulations are bullshit, sayonara. BalticBowser (talk) 02:31, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You clearly aren't reading what is being said. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:34, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Don't care, I just placed the facts CONFIRMED BY HERS ALONE and you decided to remove it for being too vague. Man, media literacy is lost on people. I need a laugh. BalticBowser (talk) 02:38, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
