Talk:Clonk

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 February 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Notability

Why was the notability box added again? Several tests of independant game magazines are linked. Shouldn't this satisfy notability? Sven Eberhardt (talk) 22:11, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, are these actual articles or press releases? If these are independent articles written by the press then they certainly count towards notability. Comrade Graham (talk) 06:45, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

these are actual articles. --(77.64.199.251 (talk) 21:59, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Has someone these articles archived? Webarchive does not have them. Shaddim (talk) 20:24, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DIGGERS

Why no notice of DIGGERS similarity? Yura87 (talk)

There's also similarity to e.g. Terraria or Minecraft. Does it really make sense to link to every game if their only connection is similarity? That would better be solved using categories in my opinion.

It might make sense to link if they have some kind of connection, e.g. one was inspired by the other. But that would be hard to prove. 95.33.104.4 (talk) 10:20, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Clonk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20140629120803/http://www.clonk.de/forum/de/topic_show.pl?tid=7937 to http://www.clonk.de/forum/de/topic_show.pl?tid=7937
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.clonk.de/forum/en/topic_show.pl?tid=1914
Added archive https://archive.is/20140629120756/http://www.clonk.de/forum/en/topic_show.pl?tid=1917 to http://www.clonk.de/forum/en/topic_show.pl?tid=1917
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.clonk.de/press/PCGames2003.pdf
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.clonk.de/press/Shareplay2004.pdf
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.clonk.de/press/SuperPCSpiele2005.pdf
Added archive https://archive.is/20121231073608/http://www.clonkforge.net/ to http://www.clonkforge.net/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]