Talk:Communicative rationality

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Philosophy: Social and political Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy

Sociology

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Is this the same thing as theory of communicative reason?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 21:32, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, but I'm guessing yes. Lucidish 21:42, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Independent of the merit of the article itself, (Cooke, 1994) is cited twice but no reference is given. 141.212.109.98 (talk) 19:24, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cooke 1994 seems to refer to Maeve Cooke's Language and Reason: A Study in Habermas's Pragmatics. I have added this to the bibliography. Veracon.net (talk) 14:56, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 January 2020 and 27 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Umachoudhury.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rational discourse

Why does this redirect here rather than, say, Argumentation theory or Reason (reasoning)? --Nemo 07:45, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have the sense this article was put together by philosophy students. Too many explanations offered here rely on terms of art, mandating lots of drilling-down to understand those explanations. It is simply confusing; cut the crap, guys; explain things clearly and simply. Think Aristotle, not Plato. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.240.83.101 (talk) 06:09, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]