From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Re: criticism impartiality... I removed the "it was probably inevitable" and just stated the facts, is that OK now? (talk) 18:39, 26 March 2011 (UTC) Porejide


There's something very strange about a major criticism of this field being that it's named -omics. The first reference cited is some blog, where the writer says that the use of this suffix annoys him. There's no scientific content at all, as he himself acknowledges. Does such flimsy material belong in the criticism section? --Gargletheape (talk) 23:25, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Connectomics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:10, 12 August 2017 (UTC)