Talk:Consolidated C-87 Liberator Express

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Specifications[edit]

Needs Specs, doesn't even have a section for it. --Colputt 20:11, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prototype[edit]

I don't see how the prototype could have been a B-24D that crashed in 1943 since C-87 deliveries to Army Air Transport Command commenced in the fall of 1942.SamMcGowan (talk) 20:03, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RY[edit]

No mention of the RY variant of the U.S. Navy. Drutt (talk) 13:59, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone have a reference with information about actual use of the aircraft by the USN? It's my understanding that the Navy sometimes assigned designations to USAAF aircraft it evaluated but never actually ordered. If the Navy actually ordered and used the RY, I'd be eager to hear about it. I'd also be curious to know whether they used the "Liberator Express" name considering that their ASW patrol variant of the B-24 was called the PB4Y Privateer. ("Privateer Express"?) Carguychris (talk) 14:15, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
References noted, RY added. Carguychris (talk) 21:47, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Huh?[edit]

"The aircraft could also become unstable in flight if its center of gravity shifted due to improper cargo loading. This longitudinal instability arose from the aircraft's hasty conversion from bomber to cargo transport." So what? Name one airplane that DOESN'T become unstable if its loaded out of limits. That's why flight crews compute weight and balance. SamMcGowan (talk) 20:06, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The C-87 was relatively unforgiving of improper loading compared to other USAAF transports. The section is poorly worded; I've been meaning to rewrite it but I've never gotten around to it. Carguychris (talk) 14:31, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

C-109[edit]

Just added a variant list to the aticle but I didnt include the C-109 (since added by another user). As the C-109 is a direct conversion of the B-24 and not related to the C-87 does it really belong in this article? MilborneOne (talk) 22:16, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you mention it, I agree that it really doesn't belong here, especially since the B-24 article already discusses the C-109. I'd vote for deleting the C-109 references. Anyone else have an opinion? Carguychris (talk) 21:47, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
C-109 redirects here, so I added a section, and plan to take it out of 'variants'. I didn't spot it under B-24. Alanf777 (talk) 05:21, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
(Redirected from C-109 Liberator Express) ... which is what google gave me ... I found instructions on how to redirect a page, but not how to change a redirect Alanf777 (talk) 01:26, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I RE-redirected C-109 Liberator Express to the B-24 page!!! Maybe we should leave a link in this page to note the difference? I'll copy some stuff from here .. eg the C-109 picture and then clean this page up. Whew!!!Alanf777 (talk)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Consolidated C-87 Liberator Express. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:05, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Consolidated C-87 Liberator Express. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:28, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Consolidated C-87 Liberator Express. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:11, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

nose door[edit]

the text of this article claimed that "the glassed-in (glazed) nose compartment was replaced with a hinged door for cargo loading". Not only does this literally mean that the entire nose was removed and replaced with a hatch roughly level with the forward cockpit bulkhead, the implication is that this was added as a variant of modern cargo doors, to aid in loading cargo straight into the plane. This is a physical impossibility with a Liberator. The only communication between the nose and main fuselage is by crawling under the cockpit floor for several feet, beside the retracted main gear. You would find it easier to load cargo via the original crew hatch. They added the door to make the nose compartment into usable cargo space, because it would be basically unusable space otherwise, since it can't be reached from the main fuselage with any degree of ease. The alternative would be to raise the cockpit 4 or 5 feet, which would be a major structural alteration, and which would defeat the purpose of the C-87 idea. So the plane is divided into a main cargo hold, with a cargo door, and a fore cargo hold with a cargo door, for lighter, miscellaneous cargo. Some would also say a rear cargo hold in the rear fuselage space, also for lighter cargo, but accessed via the main door.


64.223.93.166 (talk) 21:24, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Consolidated_C-87_Liberator_Express&oldid=1201111098"