Talk:Culcairn

Australia: Places / Riverina Low‑importance

	Australia portal Culcairn is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian places (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Riverina (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Sources[edit]

Shire Council History report —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mattinbgn (talk • contribs) 14:07, 2 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Culcairn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060901031953/http://walkabout.com.au/locations/NSWCulcairn.shtml to http://walkabout.com.au/locations/NSWCulcairn.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:03, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oasis in the Riverina?[edit]

It’s in the lede, but who is saying it? If it’s a marketing/branding exercise of the council or tourist campaign, let’s say that, suitably cited. Kerry (talk) 12:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

removal of uncited sentence from the lead.[edit]

hi all, just removed uncited edit from the lead, originally ip edit of dec 2017: "Culcairn is more commonly known throughout the region as 'The town of a thousand'" (see here) than edited, again unsourced, by a spa on 1 july 2019 (see here) as no sources backing up the statement(s) have come to light. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:44, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]