Jump to content

Talk:Cyber-utopianism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

perhaps a mild argument to remain distinct

[edit]

At the very least, it seems "Cyber-Utopianism" is worthy of a specific section of an article since it has value as a concept defined in a published work that is distinct from other terms, such as Technological utopianism. That being said, it may be the case that Cyber-utopianism is encapsulated within the concept of Technological utopianism. However, it seems like there are no strong arguments either way, and for the sake of leaving at least a brief comment, it seems fine to let it have its own article for the time being, though if any merger is to take place, I expect the content transfered to the Technological utopianism page to be non-trivial. Mattsenate (talk) 23:50, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Closing merge

[edit]

Merge request has been open since 2012 - closing as a ridiculously long time has passed -- Callinus (talk) 08:09, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cyber-utopianism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:52, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]