Talk:DC League of Super-Pets

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the DC League of Super-Pets article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Comics: DC Comics / Films Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by DC Comics work group.
	This article is supported by Comic book films work group.

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: Comic book / American / Animated

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Comic book films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

United States: Animation / Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Animation: American / Films / Warner Bros. Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Warner Bros. Animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Production Company

@Chrome Boy. The credits on the website states "Warner Bros. Pictures presents A Seven Bucks Production" also in the trailers we see the Warner Animation Group (WAG) logo and DC logo, but are not mentioned in the credits billing. My arguement is that unlike Pixar Animation studios or Lucasfilm, WAG is not standalone studio working independently, it is an animation production division used by Warner Bros. Pictures, so i think Warner Bros. Pictures should also be in the production companies. If you have issues with presents and production credits then why Marvel Studios, Lucasfilm are credited as production company despite being credited as a presenter.Rupturestriker (talk) 06:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I literally don’t understand why you are changing production companies on DC films. It’s literally been like that for YEARS before you joined here. This shows that literally no one else cares about it so why should you care about it now instead of then? CB (talk) 11:24, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DC League of Super Pets

Taylor Swift as Wonder Woman Ice Cube as Cyborg Tom Kenny as The Flash Brad Garrett as Aquaman 86.41.222.100 (talk) 06:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The theatrical poster

It's amazing how the teaser poster is still here and almost a month away before the movie comes out. --XSMan2016 (talk) 21:41, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Schwartz as Ted Bedderhead (cameo)

John Cena as Fred Bedderhead (cameo)

Blake Shelton as Zeb Zoober (cameo)

Keith Urban as Tennessee O Neal (cameo) 2001:BB6:A66F:7D58:30E7:80CB:2591:2B13 (talk) 12:06, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trivial fact...

It was also the final movie to be released by Warner Animation Group before it was rebranded as Warner Bros. Pictures Animation in 2023.^[1] XSMan2016 (talk) 00:44, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ D'Alessandro, Anthony (June 9, 2023). "Newly Appointed Warner Bros. Pictures Animation Boss Bill Damaschke On Group Rebrand, New Mission, 'Flintstones' Pic & More". Deadline Hollywood. Retrieved June 10, 2023.

Movie's Unknown Future

Yeah, hey. So at some point it was mentioned this movie was going to become a franchise, but like it's been over a year and so far NOTHING has happened. I think it would be definitely fair to bring this up on the page, but some guy keeps undoing my edits without any reason. 68.6.190.49 (talk) 17:04, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to say nothing has been announced Indagate (talk) 17:57, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

> There is no need to say nothing has been announced

And yet, other Wikipedia articles do the same thing. I see nothing wrong with doing the same on this article as well. 68.6.190.49 (talk) 18:59, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what other article? Indagate (talk) 19:10, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are various others but here's an example from one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Migos#2023–present:_Tributes_To_Takeoff

The article mentions: On February 22, 2023, Quavo posted a music video for his song "Greatness". A song written in dedication to Takeoff, it has been frequently interpreted as confirmation that the group has broken up. However, as of today, no official statement has been made.

If this does not convince you otherwise that mentioning all franchise plans for League of Super Pets hasn't happened at all is still unnecessary, then, I dunno what else to say at this point. 68.6.190.49 (talk) 19:25, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not familiar with that article so not removing, but it's definitely not right, "today" is language to be avoided on WP because it's not continuously checked. Only statements need to be noted, not the lack of statement. Indagate (talk) 19:34, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

People are still not tolerating the unknown status of the movie's franchise being stated, to the point of someone telling there's no need to state it on the page. But we're telling you, it's been two years now since the movie has been released, and things have changed with WB since then. So yes, there is a cause for concern. JoJoTheDodo456 (talk) 15:17, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Literally other Wikipedia articles point out things that haven't happened even though they were supposed to. Why is it so bad to do that with this article? 2600:8801:F802:5300:70AA:EAB0:3F11:F8FD (talk) 15:22, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For example with Warner Bros, they literally cancelled three completed or nearly-completed movies in the time since this movie came out, with the latest one, Coyote vs. ACME, having been canned since the last time the edit subject was brought up on this very talk page. Don't you think this movie's franchise plans might be at risk too? JoJoTheDodo456 (talk) 15:27, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Future plans might be at risk but doesn't need to be noted, if a reliable source confirms they're cancelled etc then can note, but with nothing it's just speculation and not appropriate for Wikipedia. Indagate (talk) 15:40, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it is appropriate, nothing has been stated yet, other than the Black Adam sequel plans not going ahead, (Dwayne Johnson did say something about that, and he's also in this movie( and it's unlikely that there will be anything stated in the foreseeable future, so it should be pointed out whether the staff on Wikipedia like it or not. JoJoTheDodo456 (talk) 15:57, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For further info, I did try talking to some people behind LoSP myself, including Jared Stern and all on social media, but I didn't get a reply from any of them. JoJoTheDodo456 (talk) 15:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

everything in Black_Adam_(film)#Future, there's no unsourced speculation, but that's irrelevant to this article. Indagate (talk) 16:44, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the closest piece of evidence I've gotten to the possibility of the movie getting a sequel, and this was from James Gunn's official Twitter account responding to a question that does involve LoSP. https://x.com/JamesGunn/status/1623781598620684290 JoJoTheDodo456 (talk) 16:54, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did add an actual source to the page on a latest edit, and it got reverted by Barry Wom, someone who has been blocked for edit warring. I'm legit not trying to start a war here, I just want to get some point across and show that the lack of information is notable, and for that to be the end of it. JoJoTheDodo456 (talk) 19:41, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging them as mentioned, @Barry Wom, they're not currently blocked so doesn't seem relevant. That tweet doesn't explicitly confirm anything so can't take anything from it, still no actual news. Indagate (talk) 20:19, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's still currently unknown if/when the movie is going to get a sequel, so is anyone at least going to agree with that sentiment, even if there's no notable info at present?

What Gunn was confirming was that there was projects that would continue to be made outside of the DC Cinematic Universe, so it's the closest we have to the possibility of a sequel to the movie. If you want to see how hard it is to even get some info about the follow-up, then just try talking to people like Dwayne Johnson, Jared Stern and Sam Levine yourself. JoJoTheDodo456 (talk) 20:32, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there's no information in a reliable source about whether project is happening or not, then there's nothing to include in the article. Indagate (talk) 20:36, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there's been no information for a long amount of time on the movie by any source, it could mean many things. I'm seriously trying to find one to get confirmation on the movie, but I literally can't find anything. And I won't stop until the problem with the radio silence on the movie's future is sorted out for good.

If you and others overseeing this artlcle are gonna keep dismissing this worrying status on the future of the film, I'll quit Wikipedia editing indefinitely. JoJoTheDodo456 (talk) 20:44, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JoJoTheDodo456 Good luck. If you manage to find any information from a reliable source, you are of course welcome to add it to the article. Barry Wom (talk) 07:10, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If I can be really honest here, it's pretty scummy that y'all are just gatekeeping this page over a piece of trivia. If it's so "unnecessary", "not notable" or "unsourced", how come you guys aren't doing this with other Wikipedia articles that use this sort of trivia? 2600:8801:F802:5300:25D2:4347:BBCB:8559 (talk) 19:08, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want evidence of examples of such articles, then there you go, and I'll even include some specific points for some of them if needed, and most of these statements included are at the top of those pages:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wet_N_Wild_(North_Shields)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAS_Australia:_Who_Dares_Wins

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adelaide_Productions

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Vine_(TV_programme)#Alexis_Conran_and_Friends

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Voice_of_Holland_season_12

To @Indagate and @Barry Wom: If you see this message and have read the examples listed, then my friend and I ask you this - please reconsider everything about your decisions made on handling this article. JoJoTheDodo456 (talk) 19:24, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Other pages are irrelevant to this page. Please just let it go. Indagate (talk) 20:25, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Other pages are irrelevant to this page" just say you're gatekeeping the hell out of this page without any reason other than to be a dong over the internet.

Apparently it's too hard to allow something that seemingly the rest of Wikipedia has so far zero problem with. Perhaps you should consider accepting change and just let me add the stupid trivia point.

Or maybe this ridiculous argument can go on. Choice is yours. 2600:8801:F802:5300:25D2:4347:BBCB:8559 (talk) 20:45, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] D'Alessandro, Anthony (June 9, 2023). "Newly Appointed Warner Bros. Pictures Animation Boss Bill Damaschke On Group Rebrand, New Mission, 'Flintstones' Pic & More". Deadline Hollywood. Retrieved June 10, 2023.

[1]