Talk:Dan Bricklin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Bricklin comments[edit]

As the person the page is about, I will put my comments here and hope someone appropriate will act on those comments.

There is currently a link to a web design company at the end of the External Links section, recently added. Unlike the link to (the current owner of the Trellix technology) I guess that new link is spam -- it has nothing to do with me that I can recall, and I assume it should be removed. I'm not sure how relevant the link to is, given that the link should follow the owners of the Trellix products and I haven't been involved with it in years (from before it moved from Interland to and those entities have their own Wikipedia pages, which are links in the main text.

The best link for my personal information is not but rather Currently they point to the same website, but the one might one day just be used for my blog ( has been my main web site since early 1999.

Someone looking for more information from a "reliable source" for here might want to use the biographical material in the book "Bricklin on Technology".

A link to "" (the start of the history of VisiCalc section on my web site) may be appropriate in the External Links section as "Bricklin's online story of VisiCalc" -- it can be "verified" by looking at the book which is published by a reputable publisher and which shares much of the text and some of the photos. This would be helpful to students using Wikipedia for homework research.


DanBricklin (talk) 17:15, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

No one seems to be looking at this, so I made changes that should be OK to the external links: I removed the link to the web design company that is unrelated to Dan Bricklin. I also changed the domain of my personal website to, not (which is a second domain that points to the same place for now, but was intended mainly for the blog at Finally, I removed the external link to Dan Bricklin is not working there (and has not -- only at a company it acquired before the acquisition). The relationship is explained in the main body of the article and there is a link there to the Wikipedia page for that should have up-to-date external links. Otherwise, the relationship to seems overly strong, which is misleading. DanBricklin (talk) 17:08, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Dan, thanks for letting us know what needs changed in your Wikipedia article (and thanks for Visicalc too! I loved it on sight). But you should feel free to make changes. As long as you use your common sense to differentiate between edits which others might see as whitewash and edits which just add to the article, no one sensible is going to object to your changes. If you do think that a change should be made but think it might be controversial or aren't sure how others would see it, just describe it on the article's talk page and announce your intention to make the change to the article in, say, a couple of weeks if there's no objection. That way any objectors get a chance to say why they don't like it and you don't have to wait endlessly for some relatively trivial change to be made. Cheers -- Derek Ross | Talk 06:12, 15 December 2009 (UTC)


I expanded Daniel Bricklin's entry significantly, and have also added additional references. FDerkinson (talk) 21:16, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dan Bricklin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:44, 3 September 2017 (UTC)