Jump to content

Talk:Daniel Imperato

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Should Article Daniel Imperato be deleted?

[edit]

Original article was deleted for non notability in 2006. Recreated in 2007. Nominated again for deletion in 2009 with no consensus. I am requesting comment both on the issue of deleting the article for non notability and one neutrality and POV issues within the article. Safiel (talk) 23:08, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's junky, but he's a marginally notable perennial candidate. --Orange Mike | Talk 03:04, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to delete, just go to AfD; I don't see any reason to hold an RfC first. Yoshi348 (talk) 17:03, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I probably should have just went ahead and done that. I will go ahead and leave this up a few more days and then probably will go for an AfD. Safiel (talk) 17:38, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to go ahead and close this discussion and list this article at AfD. Safiel (talk) 20:45, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Daniel Imperato. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:55, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]