Talk:Death of Raymond Zack

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Neutrality's removal of sources of people who commented about the Event

Let's put aside for the moment the dismissal of a Penn State U. link... The content of the articles written is not what gives veracity to the statement that the outrage was national, it's the mere existence of these articles, that lends veracity. Mowster (talk) 20:39, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Call for sources for Recent Edits

Released audio recordings from the 9-1-1 dispatch center, some of which were included in the documentary, confirm many of the edits that User:Kind_Tennis_Fan reversed. Material just needs to be verifiable, not endlessly cited ad naseum. Mowster (talk) 00:19, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... the event made international and national headlines, and was covered exclusively on CNN and FOX NEWS television, as well as other outlets.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1393012/Suicidal-man-left-die-San-Francisco-Bay-rescuers-didnt-cold-water-gear.html

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2011/06/budget-cuts-kept-firefighters-police-on-beach-as-suicide-victim-drowns/1#.VpMhLBUrKM8

With the Kitty Genovese story debunked, Zack's death stands as a genuine example of the bystander effect.

The claim of significance is credible, and is supported with verifiable citations. Per A7, it deserves to NOT be deleted.

"If the claim of significance is credible, the A7 tag can not be applied, even if the claim does not meet the notability guidelines. Topics that seemed non-notable to new page patrollers have often been shown to be notable in deletion discussions."

--Mowster (talk) 03:29, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]