Jump to content

Talk:Dotbusters

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Clean up and Corrections

[edit]

The article stated that "Most of the gang members were of European heritage". This is wrong. The dotbuster gangmembers were consists of Latino heritage. I am not self-claiming this. The university text book "Race, Class, and Gender in the United States, Rothenburg, Seventh Edition. " has more information about this racist gang. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.216.19.14 (talk) 22:30, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A longer article already exists for this under Dot Buster, that's why I cleared this pageJmm6f488 03:55, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


  • An article of this length just gives credence to what was the work of a very few people - hardly an epidemic of anti-Indian bias attacks, this was rather one or two people who played to the media. I encourage the authors and evaluators to reconsider this article as it is a distortion of history. Jersey City has been largely welcomeing of the Indian community; we should not allow one or two bigots to diminish that history. John B, Jersey City Library, local history room. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.158.179.206 (talk) 19:45, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

The information on Navroze Mody is false. It is based on an anonymous letter to the editor of the Jersey Journal newspaper by someone who claimed membership in an apocryphal "dot busters" white, racist gang and the subsequent, false New York Times story blaming this nonexistent gang for Mr. Mody's murder. From this initial seed, it has blossomed into a self-perpetuating cottage industry, entirely dependent upon that initial, false story.

I knew Navroze Mody. And I followed his murder trial both in person at the Hudson County courthouse and in the media. He was Parsi (Persian ancestors who, as Zoroastrians, fled to India 1,000 years ago to escape the Arab Muslim genocide in their nation.) He was surrounded on the street in Hoboken by a group of ten to twelve Puerto Rican-Americans. The four who were found guilty of the attack at trial had the surnames of Acevedo, Padilla, and the Gonzalez brothers. At the time, he was walking with a white co-worker from Citicorp in Manhattan, when they were both accosted.

Therefore, the victim was not ethnically what most people would consider "Indian". He was of Persian descent and therefore light skinned, like Iranians. And his murderers were not "white racists," they were Hispanic. Therefore, contrary to the false initial story and all subsequent repetitions of it, Mr. Mody's murder was not the result of an attack by white, racist "dot busters"; a dark Indian murdered by whites, but rather a light Parsi murdered by dark Puerto Ricans.

It is also false that they shouted at him "Dot-head", but rather, either "baldie" or "Kojak" according to the court testimony of witnesses. That was because Mr. Mody was bald from a condition known as alopecia. (Again, they had no way of knowing that his family had emigrated from India, because he did not look Indian.)

But when the Times ran with their slander (and never attempted to correct it), it inflamed passions in the region toward a race of people who had nothing to do with the crime, it attracted the initial interest of Tawana Brawley hoaxer C. Vernon Mason (until he learned the true identity of the attackers), and it created a race-based cottage industry that today still draws grant money by perpetuating the original lie that a white, racist gang murdered an Indian man on the streets of Hoboken. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eagle in NYC (talk • contribs) 15:53, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You forgot to provide any evidence for your story and are generally not very credible. --217.251.227.213 (talk) 18:35, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty blatant violation of NPOV in this article. While I personally agree with the very condemnatory tone in the article (no tolerance for the intolerant), it's clearly lacking in objectivity when an attack can described as an "atroscity". Going to comb the article, replacing charged words with more factual, neutral ones. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.215.158.1 (talk) 18:26, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trouble archiving links on the article

[edit]

Hello. I am finding myself repeatedly archiving links on this page. This usually happens when the archive doesn't recognize the archive to be good.

This could be because the link is either a redirect, or I am unknowingly archiving a dead link. Please check the following links to see if it's redirecting, or in anyway bad, and fix them, if possible.

In any event this will be the only notification in regards to these links, and I will discontinue my attempts to archive these pages.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:24, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dotbusters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:42, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dotbusters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:15, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dotbusters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:41, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dotbusters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:31, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dotbusters&oldid=1207019260"