Talk:Drugs.com
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Drugs.com article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Drugs.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for //drugs.com/page.cfm?s=430,444,100000350
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:40, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Drugs.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://drugs.com/page.cfm?s=430,444,100000350
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100701090256/http://wired-vig.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/1999/07/20845 to http://wired-vig.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/1999/07/20845
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Reliability of drugs.com? Is the website for profit?
[edit]Personally I find the information useful and reliable.
But in some Wikipedia talk pages, for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Donepezil people claim the website is not reliable.
Can you give examples of wrong or unreliable information at drugs.com? And do they correct if one sends corrections?
Do drug companies advertise at drugs.com? Which drugs and which companies recently? If yes, that might lower reliability.
ee1518 (talk) 06:35, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- The place to discuss reliability of sources about medicine is at WT:MED. This Talk page is for discussing this Wikipedia article. Not whether the subject of this article is useful as a reference elsewhere in WP. Jytdog (talk) 22:26, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Those host stuff from a bunch of groups, some better than others. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:29, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
What a horrible website
[edit]Basically it seems involved in click bait garbage using Google. They'll list a high interaction for drugs combinations, for instance, in a Google search at the top as, I presume, a sponsored search result, then you click on it and further down will say No Interactions Found followed by a long list of Other Interactions with this Medication Searched or other such garbage. -Reticuli 2600:2B00:7628:D700:4132:F954:E301:8559 (talk) 12:31, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- Start-Class Internet articles
- Low-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- Start-Class neuroscience articles
- Low-importance neuroscience articles
- Start-Class medicine articles
- Low-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- Start-Class pharmacology articles
- Low-importance pharmacology articles
- WikiProject Pharmacology articles
- Start-Class Websites articles
- Low-importance Websites articles
- Start-Class Websites articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Websites articles