Talk:Duncormick

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January edits[edit]

Just a quick not to say that I have removed many of the tourist links, and commercial external links. Wikipedia is not a tourist guidebook nor a promoter of commercial operations. Check out What Wikipedia is not. Maps, and links to maps are redundant as they are linked from the infobox. Also image size forcing has been removed per the MOS. Personally I would replace the image in the infobox with an image of the town proper and not a touristy image that contributes nothing to the identity of the town—it could have been taken virtually anywhere in the Irish countryside. ww2censor (talk)

I would like to put an image in at the beginninf of article, beside the contents box (before location). However, yet whenever i do, the article layout ruins.

Also theres too big a gap which cannot be removed under location. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.151.109.222 (talk) 22:10, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Updates[edit]

The image in the infobox is now an image representing the identity of the town, the village centre. -Hsdnalerio —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.232.209 (talk) 01:54, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note my summery on the page edit when removing the view from the infobox - that image is supposed to be a town crest not a view. Cheers ww2censor (talk) 01:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Railway and Roads[edit]

There's very little information on the internet regarding Duncormick railway station, whilst i've found articles mentioning the station in Dail Eireann archive, it would be helpful if somebody could add further knowledge to this article regarding this subject. Whilst i understand the station served Bridgetown and Wellington bridge, it may have also served other rural communities, any further information would be much appreciated. Thanks

Also, many rural roads are connected to Duncormick, if anybody knows there exact name please add them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by hsdnalerio (talkcontribs) 23:58, January 29, 2008

Places to see[edit]

There's no mention here of the monastery that Duncormick used to have once, along the Killag road. All I know is that it was burnt down, there was an underground passageway leading somewhere, and that it's the Power's burial place. You'd have to ask Ibar Power (the owner of the land) for more info, if there's none available written anywhere... He lives at the entrance of Sea Lane (the one leading to the burrow), if anyone's interested. I'd to it myself, but I'm currently overseas... Jack the Stripper (talk) 01:50, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would do it too except im abroad during term time, i live on Seafield Lane, was that what you meant when you said 'sea lane?'.

Hsdnalerio (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 18:12, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See my talk page for further discussion. Jack the Stripper (talk) 23:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Surrounding Area[edit]

Since Duncormick is not just used for the name of the village but also for the rural area surrounding it, should more information be added regarding the rural community outside the village? I'm unsure whether the census refers to the village itself, or also that of the surrounding community, however, since the census is reasonably high and the village is small, i'm guessing it refers to the entire area of duncormick including village and community. Infact i've just answered my own question since the census definately includes the aurrounding community since it's quite high. If anybody could add further information that would be great.Hsdnalerio (talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.159.22.19 (talk) 14:30, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

tourist attractions[edit]

quad attack - good fun, but i broke my arm there Darigan (talk) 14:51, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

River Muck?[edit]

Is there such a river or is this a hoax? --GuillaumeTell 00:06, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Duncormick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:40, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Duncormick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:42, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Summary[edit]

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

Hi. In recent days I have significantly summarised this article.

In some cases this has been to remove uncited and inappropriate guidebook editorial (for example the flowery text about locals having "Guinness in one hand, crisps in the other" while "Time passes slowly as people dwell deep into conversation"). Per WP:NOTGUIDEBOOK and WP:TONE. Or has been to remove uncited and vanity text (about "the number one Farmer in the parish"). Per WP:HOAX. In other cases it has been to address promotional text (like the advertising style wording about a pub or car dealer or supermarket "home baked cakes"). Per WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTPROMO. Other excessive weasel words and unattributed opinions have been removed (like "excellent facilities", "beauty, clean air and plenty of space", "magnificent triumph", "glowing community spirit", "magnificent picnic area", "spectacular views", etc). Per WP:PEACOCK and WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV. I have also removed some of the "nearby attractions" (many of which are in other places - like Wexford, New Ross or Enniscorthy - and therefore better dealt with in the articles on these places). Per WP:OFFTOPIC and WP:RELEVANCE.

I have retained some of the clean-up tags (as some uncited editorial in the tourism section remains). And have also tagged some content in the education section. As, ideally, this section would also be improved. (Right now it pretty much says that the children of the parish attend various schools around Wexford. And then effectively lists every school in a 30km radius. This amounts to an uncited and indiscriminate list - without established/verifiable inclusion criteria. Unless this can be addressed, this list [effectively a "list of schools within 30km of Duncormick"] should perhaps be removed).

I've separately bulked-up the references in a few areas.

While they are hopefully clear and self-evident (relative to the specific policies/norms), I am adding this note mainly to explain my edits. And to provide a thread for comments. If needed.

Cheers. Guliolopez (talk) 17:35, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It's been a few months since my note above. Unless there are other thoughts, I am going to address the remaining issues myself/directly. (The "schools within 30km" list - per WP:LISTV#INC. The "fields are great for hurling" text - per WP:OR. Etc.) Guliolopez (talk) 02:40, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Resolved - Given that it's been more than two months since my first note above, and as I hadn't heard any other input, I have addressed some of the issues noted. Including removing some of the OR/editorial (about fields being great places for kids to puck a ball[1]), or the seemingly indiscriminate lists of schools and tourist attractions in South Wexford (including the apparent "list of every school from New Ross to Rosslare"[2]). I have removed the related cleanup hatnotes, and am closing this thread. Guliolopez (talk) 00:34, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Duncormick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:02, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]