Talk:Earth in culture
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Grizzly Bear Hunter.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Earth as art
[edit]Can the e-book Earth as art be mentioned ? See http://www.nasa.gov/connect/ebooks/earth_art_detail.html KVDP (talk) 14:28, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Earth in culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080527192629/http://www2.truman.edu/~edis/writings/articles/CFI-2001.pdf to http://www2.truman.edu/~edis/writings/articles/CFI-2001.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]Can someone explain How "Erda" Is Etymologically Related to Arabic word for "Al-Ard" ??? This Need Verification , Or should be deleted , i guess !!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.186.198.47 (talk) 13:04, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Note !
[edit]If my memory is tight i would say , there is likely Similar word for Erda Among Altai Languages ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.186.198.47 (talk) 13:07, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Too many images
[edit]I removed some (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Earth_in_culture&type=revision&diff=1039523090&oldid=1039522932&diffmode=source), feel free to restore when the article gets longer and if they seem relevant. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:07, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Notable images of Earth from space
[edit]What are the criteria for inclusion? Who judges what's notable here? Note that we already have Timeline of first images of Earth from space as a separate article (and it has a similar problem, see Talk:Timeline_of_first_images_of_Earth_from_space#Criteria_for_inclusion). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:09, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Piotrus: The inclusion criterion here is based on Wikipedia's notability (WP:N): the image would have to have attracted significant media attention; ideally, the image would have its own article. fgnievinski (talk) 19:25, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Fgnievinski That's reasonable, but 2 out of 6 images don't seem to have their own article? I'd suggest limiting it only to notable images, otherwise we enter a slippery slope. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:01, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Piotrus: Fair enough, I've removed non-notable images: [1]. fgnievinski (talk) 15:40, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've added the criteria for inclusion we discussed (and that match the section title) there too. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Piotrus: Fair enough, I've removed non-notable images: [1]. fgnievinski (talk) 15:40, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Fgnievinski That's reasonable, but 2 out of 6 images don't seem to have their own article? I'd suggest limiting it only to notable images, otherwise we enter a slippery slope. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:01, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]I just wanted to make others aware of the section that I added about creation myths in different cultures/religions. If anyone feels as if this doesn’t fit the topic feel free to take it out. Thanks!Grizzly Bear Hunter (talk) 01:56, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Why
[edit]Why 2601:401:4280:4FC0:ACFB:69A8:3D8F:2965 (talk) 20:06, 23 January 2022 (UTC)