Talk:Economic policy of the Bill Clinton administration

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Economics Mid‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Taxation (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation articles

United States: Presidents / Government Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United States Presidents (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Mid-importance).

Housing bubble and Derivatives created under Clinton

Where is it mentioned that the Subprime bubble began under Clinton? It also helped fuel the gdp numbers.--76.92.122.151 (talk) 01:40, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism Section

Yeah, um... The third section in this part... I'd like to get to know these nameless "economists" that credit Clinton with the creation of NAFTA. Because, you know... I'm pretty sure that NAFTA was born under Reagan, crafted by Bush Senior, and all that was need was a signature by the time Clinton came to office. (Despite Bush desperately attempting to fast track it through at the end of his Presidency.)

Oh, and by "I'm pretty sure"....I mean it's historical fact. Those silly nameless economists. Abalu (talk) 08:47, 22 August 2009 (UTC)Abalu[reply]

Previous discussion without headers

Is it trut that Clinton utilized a variant of the American School of economics, because I heard that one of his plans was to simultanioussly fund and tax large corporations, and it was this brilliant stratagy of creating turning industry into a renewable tax resource that created the great surpluss during his administration.

Extensive Cleanup

Am going to work on cutting down the Policy sections of this article and combining them into one or two comprehensive sections. Currently, they read too much like some freshman econ major's term paper. Need to find some sources independent of the few used by the original author and try to limit the heavy usage of detailed econspeak. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.179.122.109 (talk) 19:06, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clintonomics so creative and original not Encyclopedia material

I like the anti-NAFTA Dobbsian view point espoused. But it's not a encyclopedia it is an Op-Ed right??? No !!!! Please if your going to write an artical about a word that no one uses at the very least make it accurate and well written so that at least it could be combined w/ clinton economic policy. An other thing talking about how the only bills that could be considered were deregulation the president implements the law the legislature makes them so that was not Clintons policy alone with republicans controlling both houses Clinton tried to make the best of it (having sex with an intern ) . As far as Social Security there is nothing wrong with it the easy fix is raising the amount income which can be taxed programs cost money means testing is a good idea as well the idea.It is just a bad anti-clinton artical most likely by an Obama Maniac I voted for him I agree with him on everything but IRAQ but the supporters can be anti-democrats who are not Obama and for people who were not alway part of the party or were the DEMs and REPs are the same people it is annoying---- Nate Riley 02:16, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Um, yeah. I agree. Ish. Your diatribe really loses its coherency, however, about halfway through.

I'm not a fan of Clinton. Or Obama. Or Bush, Reagan, Carter, or many Presidents, really. I really do dislike Clinton, though. Special form of dislike for the man. Even so, I'm not at all impressed with this article. Really needs work, if it even deserves to be kept. 76.27.35.131 (talk) 03:52, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Piss Poor

This is written very poorly; amateur.

Needs Cleanup!

This Wikipedia page is very informal, not a positive when it comes to articles. For example, in the "Macroeconomic policies" section, the second sentence starts, "The first factor we will examine..." The article is written much more like a lecture or PowerPoint than an encyclopedia entry. In addition, the next section keeps referring to "figure 2" and "figure 5." Not only is the term "figure" unclear, but no figures in the article exist except for a picture of Bill Clinton on a lectern. This kind of writing continues throughout the article. For this reason, I am marking this article as "needs cleanup." Aplaster (talk) 26 December 2012.

Move proposal

I would like to move this article and I am writing to assess interest. This article should be moved to a name that is more in line with Economic policy of Barack Obama and Economic policy of the George W. Bush administration. The word Clintonomics can still be referenced in the article, but the current title lacks clarity. Andrew³²⁷ 06:05, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Issues of Bias

There is a pretty extreme lack of reliable sources and appropriate sourcing format going on here. I am currently taking a look into backing up this info with additional sources. I must, however, insist that the bias demonstrated in the Macroeconomics category (and elsewhere) be altered. It is not appropriate to reword opinion articles and insert them into Wikipedia. Wendigo.zlato (talk) 02:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC) Alright, I got started with some info from Statista. To be continued...Wendigo.zlato (talk) 03:18, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Economic policy of the Bill Clinton administration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:14, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Housing bubble and deregulation of housing

People talk about the finance, but what about his loosening of housing standards and active incentivising of low quality housing 2001:448A:1082:3A7F:805F:3E05:DFCF:31D3 (talk) 07:15, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]