The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in order to move to Los Angeles to be an actress, Emma Stone prepared a PowerPoint presentation to convince her parents?
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Pride David (February 1, 2023). "Wikipedia: the good, the bad and the ugly". Poynter Institute. Retrieved February 2, 2023. As we said before, nearly anyone can edit the articles, which means people can sometimes insert misinformation or a silly detail into an article. Here's one example: Someone edited the actress Emma Stone's page to say that she "is a hot American actress with a beautiful smile. In 1987, she fell out of the sky as an angel." This type of page vandalism is usually spotted quickly and corrected.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report5 times. The weeks in which this happened:
stone recently announced that she would prefer to go by her birth name Emily, rather than Emma. the Wikipedia page should change to reflect this. 81.107.189.48 (talk) 17:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, with Emma Stone redirecting to it. I came to this talk page specifically to see how Wikipedians would deal with this conundrum. Should an article about a notable person be of the same name they are most widely known by, or by the name they prefer?
I'm not opposed to the change, but we should maybe wait a little before changing her name in the article. It's not yet clear if people are going to call her Emily or stick with Emma. As per Wikipedia's guidelines, an article name may still refer to someone with their old name if people are more likely to associate them with that name (see Cat Stevens/Yusuf Islam's name). We should wait and see how the media and people call her in the next weeks and then decide to change the name or not. Saidjk (talk) 01:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with this also. We generally don't hesitate to change names as soon as people name a preference, and Emily is already her birth name so it's hardly a radical change. Owen (talk) 01:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That policy is for subjects who undergo a name change, which does not apply here because "Emily Stone" is her legal AND preferred name. I agree that DEADNAME does not apply ("Emma Stone" is not a deadname), but I do think we should put strong weight on what an actor prefers to be referred to. By retaining Emma simply because it is dominant in media, Wikipedia contributes to the problem and makes any adjustment in representing her name that much more difficult. Note that recently a reporter DID refer her to Emily [1], and she thanked him for doing so, but he was immediately "corrected" and has even received backlash from people who didn't realize Emily was her preferred name. Owen (talk) 22:56, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It does apply if she changes her professional name, what she goes by. It did when Thandiwe Newton started going by her given name. If she changes what she goes by, the new name will show up in whatever press releases that mentions her and media will immediately comply. And even if they don't, it'll eventually show up in credits, but we don't seem to have sources confirming she is indeed changing what she goes by professionally, or what it will be. Nardog (talk) 01:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:COMMONNAME still plays a role here. As established up above, despite the initial source and that interview, she’s still being mentioned in media as Emma Stone, still being represented in her films promotions as Emma Stone. She may prefer people interacting with her in public to call her Emily but unless going forward she is credited as Emily Stone in future films or promotion it would be incorrect to relocate the page. Rusted AutoParts01:48, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did make a minor change to link "anglicized" for "Her paternal grandfather, Conrad Ostberg Sten, was from a Swedish family that anglicized their surname to "Stone". She also has German, English, Scottish, and Irish ancestry." After all, that refers to her last name rather than her Emma/Emily preference (as discussed here), and Stone is indeed her birth name rather than the change made by her grandfather. Gprobins (talk) 18:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
