Talk:Erica Tazel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Encourage correction and improvement...[edit]

...to this first pass over a talented younger actor's page. Note, especially, the citations are limited and redundant as they appear, and no wiki structure has been created to contain the text. Cheers. LeProf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.245.235 (talk) 19:42, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added an "issues" tag ... but I don't know where to start. I'll give this some thought.GcT (talk) 17:50, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I don't see any real issues here for such s short article. I neither see what "redundant citations" are supposed to be (though the quality of the sources should be improved) nor what "Wiki structure" is supposed to be missing here. Note that the text part of short articles usually doesn't really need any further "structuring".--Kmhkmh (talk) 00:19, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's kinda clunky. Maybe the article's shortness is part of what makes worthy of improvement: you can see some standard information is not there. Eh? GcT (talk) 16:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, no argument that the article can and ultimatly should be extended, but imho the normal extension process requires no templates. It is perfectly fine to have to have a rather short biographic entry, such a shortness in itself isn't really a quality issue requiring a template. Imho the use of such templates should be restricted to articles with serious issues or at least something ideally requiring immediate attenttion rather than for articles simply having room for improvement and not being an optimal article yet. Because if we tag based on the latter we will end up tagging of 50% of our articles and clog all maintenance/quality improves queues, which in a way defeats the purpose of tagging in the first place.--Kmhkmh (talk) 21:59, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Potential sources to be used and to replace the tvguide/imdb stuff[edit]

--Kmhkmh (talk) 03:15, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The date of birth is pretty obviously wrong, and not substantiated in the referenced TV Guide link. Her first TV role was as a dance instructor on Sex in the City in 2001, which if she was born in 1990 would have been when she was 11. I found another site that claims she was born on March 31, 1976, which seems more reasonable: [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.172.159.106 (talk) 17:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References