Talk:Ernest George Trobridge

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Veganism and Vegetarianism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

not a messed up move

I am the one who made ~~this~~ the EG article a redirect. This was a deliberate decision, not a messed up move, as I found two separate, but identical articles. I twas puzzled about what had happened so I just spent a few minutes looking at the history of the two pages and see that User:Stephen2810 started the E G Trobridge article back in May In the sandbox and submitted it for review on July 11: this was then reviewed and moved to article space on July 16.However, in between his submission and the approval (on July 12) S2810 went ahead and created the Ernest George Trobridge article in article space. Hence the 2 articles. My 2c are that the best way of tidying up is just to delete ~~this~~ the EG article: on reconsideration I don't think that we really need a redirect from E G Trobridge Quiet Editor (talk) 17:09, 18 July 2012 (UTC) (updated to clarify - I intended to write this on the talk page for the EG article Quiet Editor (talk) 08:48, 19 July 2012 (UTC))[reply]

What's the harm in merging the edit histories? Wouldn't that clarify to future editors what you have described? Matt (talk) 00:21, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe? But trying to merge histories from two parallel developments sounds messy to me. In any case the history merge was declined, so we're left with the EG article as a redirect. I'm going to leave it there. If anyone else has strong views, then have at it! 08:48, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

I have no problem with E G Trobridge being a redirect. Matt (talk) 10:10, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ernest George Trobridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160329084803/http://tdcws01.tandridge.gov.uk/ArcusPlanning/Planning/Planning/Planning?reference=2015-2217 to http://tdcws01.tandridge.gov.uk/ArcusPlanning/Planning/Planning/Planning?reference=2015-2217

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:20, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]