Talk:Erwin James

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Erwin James article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Erwin James real name

Wikipedia does not permit Original Research. Information which is not in any single source, but constructed by combining multiple sources or interpeting one in ways that are not obvious is considered Original Research. Do not post claims, either here or in the article, as to what James' real name is unless those claims (explicitly linking James and the alleged real name) have been published in a reliable source, such as a major newspaper. If you think you have such a case, exercise caution by posting here first, and merely linking to the source you want to include. (See policy on living persons for why are we are particularly careful in such cases.) Rd232 ^talk 13:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you mean and that's fair enough given the editorial constraints of Wikipedia that you mention. Thanks for that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.129.39.151 (talk) 21:36, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair, you should also block the 12:29 14 March 2009 edition of the page. It mentions a reference to wife and daughter that is not supported by the relevant webpage (it is from archived bbc.co.uk material and may not refer to Erwin James at all). You will note multiple changes over a short space of time ... I did not realise the page was actually being varied. I though these continued to be versions accessible only by me. 203.129.39.151 (talk) 05:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing it out, but I don't think the info there is a problem. Rd232 ^talk 05:34, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Full name seems to be reliably reported here by his Guardian editor. http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2009/apr/24/erwin-james-monahan-guardian.

Also corroborated by an Erwin James article in todays Guardian here... http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2009/apr/24/erwin-james-journalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 15.195.185.230 (talk) 09:28, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree this is now a reliable source to add the name to the article. Gonzonoir (talk) 10:25, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There's a redirect page at James Monahan, pointing to a synonymous US politician; I've added a disambig link to the target article to point back to here. Gonzonoir (talk) 11:15, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{editsemiprotected}} There is no longer any reason to protect this article, as he's no longer anonymous - see article text.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.31.164.37 (talk • contribs) 09:50, July 30, 2009

Not done: requests for changes to the page protection level should be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. -Optigan13 (talk) 04:11, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]