Talk:Eugen Goldstein

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Physics: Biographies High‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce.

Comment removed from article

Goldstien actually didnt work with cathode rays he did something similar with canal rays and shot the ray through an annode...someone should check this data. That would be crooks and edison who used cathode rays. 10:55, 16 November 2006 66.158.84.112 -- Richmeister_talk 02:43, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eugen Goldstein, Cathode Rays were NAMED by Goldstein, so yes, he apparently did work with cathode rays [...], Cathode Ray Tube history, Goldstein, Eugen (1850-1930) This one refers to Canal Rays rather than Cathode Rays, Eugen Goldstein. So, take it for what it's worth. Most references I see tend to use the term "cathode rays." Seems to make cathode rays a notable attribution to Goldstein. Especially when a number of physics sites and educations institutions seems to all say the same thing. Now, whether they're ALL using the wrong terminology is up for debate. But so far work with "cathode rays" seems to be attributable to Goldstein. Yeah? Mgmirkin 20:09, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rename? "Eugen Goldstein"

Sources I'm seeing online seem to indicate the proper name should be "Eugen" rather than the "Eugene" currently used? See some of the above notes on the prior topic. Pretty much all of them refer to "Goldstein, Eugen" or "Eugen Goldstein." So, we might want to change the namespace to reflect correct spelling, if that's in fact the case? Likewise, would want to make any necessary edits to the article itself. Likesise, then a redirect from "Eugene Goldstein" -> "Eugen Goldstein" would also be appropriate once moved, so people can still find the article. Mgmirkin 20:12, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~: Yes, it should be renamed/redirected. - Astrochemist 00:39, 2 June 2007 (UTC)~~[reply]

Hearing no comments after three days, I moved the article to correct the person's name. - Astrochemist 02:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to the article

I tried to get the names, work, and credit correct with my recent additions, mostly using the English language reference now added. (I don't have access to the German originals, and I'm rather slow with the German language.) Other items:

The burial site needs checking. I will try and find the Nature obituary in the next week or so.
The comments in the Other section need verification.
Photographs would be a good addition.

* The article needs to be renamed to correct Goldstein's name. I can't get to it just now. Perhaps someone else can. - Astrochemist 10:42, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just now moved the article to use the person's correct name. - Astrochemist 02:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bad article

Unfortunately 75% of this article is simply wrong and the German version is even more false. I've written the first reliable biography of Goldstein but now I am surprised to see the Goldstein worked "as a Jewish Immigration lawyer"? Is there any source for this information? - Mhedenus 08:37, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to locate your publications for about two weeks and did, in fact, add one (on comet tails) to the article's references. The changes I've made to the article are largely to try and better organize it. Modifications to the content were based mainly on English-language sources. As I wrote in the "Changes to the article" section above, there certainly are items in need of verification. Also, I can't find a verifiable copyright-free photograph. You're the true expert on this topic, so can you lend a hand? Thanks very much for any help you can provide. - Astrochemist 14:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is is about the article that is inaccurate? The header tag said to look here, but I can't find anything questionable except the Jewish lawyer statement, which has been removed. I did read one of the article's references and it compares well with what's in the article itself. Therefore, I deleted the inaccuracy tag since no evidence is provided here that the article is still inaccurate, about 6 weeks after the tag was first introduced. Can anyone specify any remaining inaccuracies? I would be glad to follow up on this if some specifics can be given. -- 72.75.71.105 16:14, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eugen Goldstein. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070205083108/http://dbhs.wvusd.k12.ca.us/webdocs/AtomicStructure/Proton.pdf to http://dbhs.wvusd.k12.ca.us/webdocs/AtomicStructure/Proton.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:03, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Atom

Atom is the smallest and indivisible particle of all element in a chemical reaction 102.88.37.7 (talk) 20:05, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Science

what was john dalton's discover?? 180.194.13.12 (talk) 03:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

John dalton's discovery is solid sphere model and he discover that model on 1803 and he was a english chemist,physicist and meteorologist. 180.194.13.12 (talk) 03:12, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]