Talk:Ferenc Krausz

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

‹See TfM›

Physics: Biographies High‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ferenc Krausz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150923180002/http://www.attoworld.de/Documents/papers/Reviews_of_Modern_Physics/RMP81_2009.pdf to http://www.attoworld.de/Documents/papers/Reviews_of_Modern_Physics/RMP81_2009.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:10, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Research section

Anybody in favor of WP:TNTing the Research section? Removing it completely and letting users fill it again with secondary sources could make for a better article (and would remove the orange template). This already worked in other 2023 Nobel laureates (check Moungi Bawendi and Anne L'Huillier.) ReyHahn (talk) 20:58, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Research section v2

@Thorsten Naeser: it is the third time I have to tell you that you cannot add a "Research section" without citing any sources. It looks promotional and does not have an encyclopedic tone. It would be better to add content based on specific and notable information from the Nobel summary or from other prizes (compare Louis Brus, Moungi Bawendi and Anne L'Huillier). It would be more helpful to add specific examples that are notable (making the first attosecond sources, being the first to implement it on the study of photoelectric emission, or in biology and so on) instead of having a section that just boast about attosecond physics. There was already a section on research that was removed but had a different problem, it was based purely on primary sourced produced by Krausz so avoid that too. If the section cannot be amended it would get removed again. I am taking special care of these articles as these are celebrities now per the Nobel Prize and we have to be careful due to WP:BLP.--ReyHahn (talk) 13:14, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

@Thorsten Naeser: I am making a second thread to discuss the picture of the article. The previous images had more light and looked less griny. Why do you want to use the new one?--ReyHahn (talk) 13:14, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also the new picture might be infrininging on copyright issues, please take care of that before we can use it here.--ReyHahn (talk) 13:17, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]