Jump to content

Talk:Fidesz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Map of democratic backsliding

[edit]

The map needs an addendum -> "according to University of Gothenburg" - instead of being presented as universal fact. 86.10.112.125 (talk) 01:47, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian Turanism on Ideology

[edit]

Since Orban took power, Fidesz has clearly made clear they are turanists https://hungarianspectrum.org/2018/08/13/the-flowering-of-pseudo-science-in-orbans-hungary/ and hungary becoming an observer for Organization of Turkic States in 2018 82.14.227.184 (talk) 14:08, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That source rather seems to be a WP:BLOG, we'll need a better one to back up the claim that they are promoting Turanism. Vacant0 (talk) 21:29, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-LGBTQ ideology

[edit]

The Fidesz is opposing the LGBTQ propaganda in Hungary, like the KDNP and the Our Homeland Movement party. These 3 political parties opposing the Same Sex Marriages, and the LGBT couples, who they adopting the children in Hungary. The Fidesz also opposes the LGBTQ ideology. That's why i created the Organisations that opposes LGBT rights in Hungary page. The Fidesz, the KDNP and the Our Homeland Movement is part of the Anti-LGBTQ ideology. Just these 3 parties. KovZXad1970 (talk) 20:07, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non-neutral

[edit]

In similar vein to my comment on the talk page of Criticism of Fidesz, this page is not neutral. Fidesz is known to be practically synonymous with Viktor Orbán, his political vehicle. There are ample sources that show how Fidesz has undermined democracy and the judiciary in Hungary and how it favours businesses linked to Viktor Orbán. A recent study concludes [1]:

These effects clearly show the systemic prevalence of political favoritism under the Orbán regime: crony companies enjoy this policy. Thus, the results provide evidence that we can consider the Orbán regime as the instigator and supporter of a crony system in Hungary. Moreover, it can be argued that the favoritism prevailing in this system through family relationships and close friendships could be seen as a kleptocracy, where close friends could be fronts for the political leader himself.

The article also includes non-npov content, such as:

"The strong and preeminent Fidesz has benefited from the fragmented and disjointed opposition that has proved inept at mounting a unified challenge to the ruling party "...

Hungary is not seen as a democratic country any more by many academics and democracy raters. These are not subjective opinions but facts based on agreed metrics. This needs to be given more prominent scope in the article. --Jabbi (talk) 12:54, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]