This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 14:26, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"However the Smiths logo does still appears on the packet due to various ownership reasons." - I can't see why. Other Smiths products have changed their branding to Walkers. The sentence is much too vague in any case, especially unreferenced. *Exactly what* reasons? 86.143.54.10 (talk) 22:04, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
According to The Grocer, they were relaunched as a Walkers product in 2005.[1] Presumably soon after this it was changed back ("ownership reasons" was unexplained, and has already been removed from the article). It looks like this is not the only change since the relaunch - the page I linked to only mentions 25g bags, not the 43g bags now available. Peter E. James (talk) 00:22, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}