Talk:General Hewett (1811 ship)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Australia: Maritime Low‑importance

	Australia portal General Hewett (1811 ship) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian maritime history (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article needs to be moved to "General Hewett (1811)". The data from the National Archives and the EIC site both show her launch year as 1811. Acad Ronin (talk) 02:58, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Acad, the only info I have regarding this ship pertains to Lord Amherst's diplomatic mission to China and none of those writings mention a launch year. If you have reliable sources that show the year as 1811 then, according to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ships), the page ought to be moved as you say. If you don't think the move controversial, you can simply move it yourself, using the 'move' tab at the top. Otherwise you can list it at‎ Wikipedia:Requested moves. I would humbly suggest it is okay to do the former but you will need to rectify the links which you can find by clicking on the 'what links here' link in the tools section. Currently there are only five, see Special:WhatLinksHere/General Hewett (1812), so there's not much to do. If you need a hand, you can give me a shout.--Ykraps (talk) 11:04, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Thanks. Acad Ronin (talk) 11:28, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on General Hewett (1811 ship). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141129040415/http://73rdregiment.tripod.com/id10.html to http://73rdregiment.tripod.com/id10.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:44, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]