Talk:Geology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Geology (Rated B-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon Geology is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
edit·history·watch·refresh Stock post message.svg To-do list for Geology:
  • use the structure proposed by the Wikipedia:WikiProject Science, i.e.:
    • write a section on applications (estimate risks of eruptions and seisms, search minerals, ...)
      • Green tickY Section started. Still needs work, though.
    • describe the main geological theories (plate tectonics, mineral formation, ...)
      • Green tickY Plate tectonics, some others
      • Mineral formation, petrology/thermodynamics
      • YesYRocks, YesYrock cycle
      • Landscape formation: erosion, transport, deposition of seds
  • add references to the article
    • Many more added, but can always have more. 06:15, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

need to talk about Alfred Wegner and his major contribution to geology.

Priority 1 (top)
Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team / v0.5 / Vital / Core (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.
Checklist icon
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Geology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

YesY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.Gorthian (talk) 06:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:59, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Lede too short flag[edit]

Hi all,

Noticed this flag today. Did my best to beat the lede into shape so it actually reflects the article content. It's still pretty short, but I think I like that on these "big" science articles. I also added a pretty map to the lede, because I think it's always good to have something.

Felt this covered it, so removed the flag. As always, further iterations welcome. DanHobley (talk) 10:55, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Also, think I accidentally edit conflicted with someone, and may have accidentally discarded some changes. Sorry if this was you. DanHobley (talk) 10:56, 3 August 2017 (UTC)