Talk:Gonzaga University School of Law

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Todo[edit]

Fix the facts in the very beginning. Tier Three schools are not in the top 100. So the sentence: "The U.S. News & World Report law school rankings typically place Gonzaga Law in the top 100 law schools in the U.S. or in the third tier of schools." Sorry but this just looks ridiculous. Tier Three by definition is OUTSIDE of the top 100. Also, Gonzaga is not "typically" placed in the top 100. Gonzaga was Tier Four until 2005 - which is well outside the top 100. It was then Tier Three from 2005-2008 and 2010. It tied for 100th in 2009. So the sentence is actually false about what is "typical" for Gonzaga in addition to the "definition of Tier Three" error. It looks biased and makes the entire entry look biased. Facts are good. Yes, Gonzaga has improved and is recently typically in the third tier of law schools.

-BettyNotSoWhite —Preceding unsigned comment added by BettyNotSoWhite (talk • contribs) 07:50, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Need the following:

  • Image of the law school building, school seal, and Italy campus

*Details on alumni. Famous alumni list perhaps?

  • Details on clinic- famous cases, etc. There was the case that got the youth out of jail. Appeared in the admission bulletin in 2007.
  • Something should be added about how the law school is ranked relatively low, yet has the bankroll and alumni reputation of a top tier school.

*Criticism section needed. --Longman391 19:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC)\[reply]

  • Why does the article need a Controversy/Criticism section? A page can be NPOV without assessing controversy, right? Just stick to the facts. Also, I don't think it's controversial that GU's tuition is higher than other schools, it's just a matter of fact, and since each enrolling class is at or near capacity, it doesn't seem to affect much. I would say that based on the content of this section, it should be removed entirely.Thedjb 05:04, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I guess it depends on whether or not this section contains controversy, criticism, or both. While the cost of tuition for the law school certainly isn't controversial, it is most certainly often criticized.
Looking around, however, it seems that even the most detailed articles on US law schools don't contain a section discussing criticisms or controversy, so I have removed the section entirely. For examples, see Harvard Law SchoolYale Law SchoolUniversity of Washington School of Law--Longman391 23:49, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good idea to start this page and thanks for the hard work. The NPOV seems ok, but words such as "unique" when describing the Florence campus (as it should be called, not Italy), probably aren't necessary. Also, from what I understand, and a call to the Dean's office would clarify, the primary reason for the School of Law (as it should be referred to, not Law School) dropping back to Tier 4 was a reporting error regarding the number of graduates actually employed in a legal field (GU was reporting only those working in legal practice and it therefore appeared that a large number of grads were not employed, thus significantly dropping the school's score and, subsequently, ranking. Also, an infobox should be added, along with some sources, and a WikiProject template on the discussion page.Thedjb 05:00, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • No problem- I've been meaning to do it for a while as I am beginning there in the fall and was shocked that no article existed. I fixed the Florence campus reference and changed the wording to better reflect the program. Perhaps "non-traditional" would be more appropriate? Or perhaps a sub-section on all of the non-traditional programs at GU Law?
I'll look into the infobox et all. The other pages I have created have been for sports teams- much more obvious template structure over there! Thanks for the feedback! --Longman391 00:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notable alumni section[edit]

Hi. I was working on adding citations for this section and noticed there are a few people listed who do not have Wikipedia articles. I am wondering f a person needs to have their own Wikipedia article before they should be listed in this section? I know this is the guideline for a Notable people section on a city or town page. Please let me now if this is the same guideline for the Notable alumni section? Thank you--BuzyBody (talk) 03:07, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Gonzaga University School of Law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:46, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gonzaga University School of Law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gonzaga_University_School_of_Law&oldid=1207313191"