Talk:Google Scholar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Not as good as described in this article[edit]

It seems that google scholar is not as good as described in this article. A perfect paper on the subject matter is written here You can check it out for yourself, what is written is really true. Would it thus be possible to include a milder version of my critic on this wikipedia page, like it exists in the German version of this article, without having it deleted? I thank you in advance. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.39.218.10 (talkcontribs) .

The German article referred to is aat http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Scholar
would 194.39.218.10 please give some contact information? ---
I found that your article was somewhat informative. However, it seemed to be highly biased against Google Scholar by blasting it at every opportunity. An example: "The "Googlemania" fueled by the enormous media publicity and laymen's ecstasy rubs off on Google Scholar and makes otherwise learned people disregard reality." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 131.202.42.70 (talkcontribs) .

merge[edit]

Google Scholar and academic libraries here? fgnievinski (talk) 15:45, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Oppose: The proposed merger of these articles makes no sense to me. Google Scholar deserves a distinct article so that history, features, and criticisms can be assessed in a holistic way and found together.~Mack2~ 01:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Support. The academic libraries article looks like a POV content fork and as such should be merged back (with the POV parts removed) into the main article. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:22, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Google Scholar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required on behalf of editors regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification, as with any edit, using the archive tools per instructions below. This message updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 1 May 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:37, 23 March 2017 (UTC)