Talk:Goslar
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Re: forced labour
[edit]It is, of course, thanks to the fact that there was forced labour in Goslar during World War II that Goslar was not bombed and has therefore retained a lot of its historic buildings. Hikitsurisan 21:27, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Medieval
[edit]"Being a mediæval town...."
- The accepted modern English spelling is medieval, not "mediæval."
- It's not a medieval town now — it was founded during the Middle Ages.
Re the rather petulant comment above, I don't believe the Allies would have bothered with bombing a small resort town in the Harz Mtns. The British in particular, single-mindedly led by "Bomber Harris," were more interested in causing civilian casualties in the tens of thousands on each raid, and preferred to attack large population centers.
refugees
[edit]The mayor recently said he wants more refugees: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/11253562/The-German-town-desperate-for-more-asylum-seekers.htmKdammers (talk) 09:13, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Climate table
[edit]There is something wrong with the data in the climate table. I can't believe that the average daily maximum temperature for January is as high as 10C. JH (talk page) 19:47, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Goslar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090612040022/http://www.samstag1530.de:80/?p=206 to http://www.samstag1530.de/?p=206
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:09, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Goslar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120402113512/http://wahl.goslar.de/ob/00_tabelle.html to http://wahl.goslar.de/ob/00_tabelle.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100430004649/http://www.raanana.muni.il/English/Topics/My%2BCity/Sister%2BCities/ to http://www.raanana.muni.il/English/Topics/My+City/Sister+Cities/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:28, 28 November 2017 (UTC)