Jump to content

Talk:Grameenphone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Criticism

[edit]

In the "Criticism" section, there's this sentence: "In January 2008, Bangladesh Telecommunication Regulatory Commission has filed a case against GP's two former CEO's and other officials for involvement in illegal VoIP business.[27]" The references cited is a news article on BdNews24.com, linked here - http://www.bdnews24.com/details.php?cid=2&id=37708 - which has absolutely no relation to that sentence. The article linked discusses violent disruptions to voting for the Bangladesh Chhatra League president. Perhaps the wrong link was entered. --'Kash (talk) 12:26, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Does this work? Aditya(talk • contribs) 17:48, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rebranding to Telenor

[edit]

Do they plan to rebrand operator's name to Telenor like recently it was done in Denmark? --Dima1 (talk) 11:00, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, they don't have any such plans for they consider Grameenphone has a rich history. @Dima1 - SAMI  talk

Fraud Schemes by Grameenphone

[edit]
  • Grameenphone makes money with many bad tricks to its users which falls into Fraud Scehmes. Recently they offered an Internet package titled P6 that costs only 350/- BDT for 1 GB/month use. But after one month, the package is switched to it's P1 package automatically and starts deducting money at a huge rate from the balance.
  • Last year Grameenphone offered a promotional rate of 0.25 BDT/min to its subscribers for FnF numbers, but suddenly they changed to 0.49 BDT/min without any notice. Subscribers had to notice it after they lost a lot of money.
  • This company offered another promotional campaign for the last few months of call rate 0.49 BDT/min to any GP-GP number with a lots of publicity by flooding the media but this month they increased the rate to 0.99 BDT/min with very few adverts at the media that will not be noticed by most of its subscribers and they would discover this after loosing a lot of their valuable money.

The company should be sued for doing these fraud activities to its subscribers.--Gphealer (talk) 04:40, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Court case

[edit]

Wasn't there an ugly court case between Yunus and Telenor during the takeover of Grameenphone, regarding the compensation? --84.215.125.229 (talk) 23:25, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Grameenphone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. Link rot had set in before url was archived. Worldbruce (talk) 05:30, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:23, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Grameenphone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:08, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Grameenphone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:41, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicts of interest

[edit]

I would like to point out that this article currently to a significant degree is written by Grameenphone themselves, especially the "Criticism" section, which was written by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/202.56.5.178, an IP address registered to "GPHOUSE", which is Grameenphone's headquarters. This section comes nowhere near neutrality and is only used by Grameenphone to defend themselves. Haakon (talk)

@Haakon: Would you report it to WP:COIN? Aditya(✉ • ⚒) 17:36, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Assalamuwalikum ami akta number থেকে টাকা আরেকটা নাম্বার দিতে চাই রেজিস্ট্রেশন করেছিলাম পিন নাম্বার ভুলে গেছি কিভাবে

[edit]

আমি একটা নাম্বার থেকে টাকা আরেকটা নাম্বার নিতে চাই রেজিস্ট্রার করে পিন নাম্বার এনে ছিলাম পিন নাম্বার ভুলে গেছি এখন গ্রামীণ কাস্টমারদের সাথে কি ভাবে কথা বলবো 37.111.200.225 (talk) 13:08, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Grameenphone Technological Condition

[edit]

Grameenphone Technological Condition 45.248.151.59 (talk) 18:02, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:23, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:53, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

[edit]

An ip user is spreading false information.See contributions

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Grameenphone&oldid=1249282328"