A fact from Grand Duke Michael Mikhailovich of Russia appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 May 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Despite allegations to the contrary, it is difficult to believe that Michael Mikhailovich's marriage to a Teck would not have been deemed morganatic in Russia. Russia very strictly interpreted Ebenburtigkeit, so that Tsar Alexander II's marriage to a Rurikid princess such as Princess Catherine Dolgorouky, was declared morganatic by the groom himself. Given that Michael's eventual marriage to Pushkin's granddaughter, Countess Natalia of Merenberg, was morganatic, it seems very unlikely that a Teck marriage would have been accepted as equal, especially by Alexander III in 1887 (or even Nicholas II later) any more than it would have been accepted by Kaiser Wilhelm II. Better documentation of this abortive romance is needed to support the article's implication that such a match would have been treated as legally dynastic. FactStraight (talk) 22:45, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree. I concur that Maximilian's maternal line made him more palatable to the Romanovs but a Bavarian princess did not convey any legal "dynasticity" on the Beauharnais, and was not mentioned when a Beauharnais queen was chosen to be consort in Sweden: the King there explicitly acknowledged (in a letter to his wife, Désirée Clary) that the Beauharnais did not meet Sweden's legal standard, but the King authorized the marriage anyway because of Eugene de Beauharnais' uniquely high reputation -- which is also what I think persuaded the Romanovs (and the Braganzas of both Portugal & Brazil, the Hohenzollerns, etc). The Beauharnais were in a legal gray area, whereas the Tecks were not. FactStraight (talk) 23:55, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]