Talk:Great Smoky Mountains National Park

Appalachia Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Appalachia, a collaborative effort to increase coverage of Appalachia and the Appalachian Mountains. If you would like to participate, go to the project page to see a list of related articles needing attention.AppalachiaWikipedia:WikiProject AppalachiaTemplate:WikiProject AppalachiaAppalachia articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: North Carolina High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Mid-importance).

Tennessee High‑importance

	Tennessee portal Great Smoky Mountains National Park is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas High‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Backpacking (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Backpacking, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BackpackingWikipedia:WikiProject BackpackingTemplate:WikiProject BackpackingBackpacking articles

World Heritage Sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of World Heritage Sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 January 2022 and 20 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Emmamlewis (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Wnfrase, Mnelson25.

There is a request, submitted by Catfurball, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia.

The rationale behind the request is: "Important".

Untitled

According to the U.S. National Park Service this park is the most visited U.S. national park. This information was provided in the NPS newsletter on 14-Aug-2006. As this is not an online reference, this information has not added to the article. Solarapex 10:02, 16 August 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Wow, it seems funny responding to a comment 10 years after the fact, but here goes: There are now plenty of online references that show GSMNP is the most-visited park in the system. Therefore, I will add the info, which is quite noteworthy, to the lead.Pistongrinder (talk) 16:56, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. It's already there, hidden in the middle of that clunky paragraph.Pistongrinder (talk) 17:01, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retreating northern forests

While I know this is not a page one would associate with a heated debate about global warming/climate change, this passage:

"During the most recent ice age, the northeast-to-southwest orientation of the Appalachian mountains allowed species to migrate southward along the slopes rather than finding the mountains to be a barrier. As climate warms, many northern species are now retreating upward along the slopes and withdrawing northward, while southern species are expanding."

certainly suggests a particular view on the issue and leads one to believe the current trend is one that has us headed back to normalcy. I don't agree and neither does most of the scientific community. Batvette (talk) 06:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to re-word if you have a proper citation. I'm not sure who wrote the original paragraph, but I don't think they were trying to suggest that a thinner northern forest is "normal" for the Smokies. Bms4880 (talk) 14:44, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

never mind, he was right and I was wrong.(reminds self, check your own facts before calling others' wrong.)Batvette (talk) 04:31, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Great Smoky Mountains National Park/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

==Importance==

Top importance. The Great Smoky Mountains National Park is well known in and beyond Tennessee. As a UNESCO world heritage site a top importance is adequate.

==Quality== B-Class. The article is well structured. Images are used to illustrate the topic and links to related topics are relevant. No redundant information and clear language.

References are used but could be extended to cover more of the facts stated in the article. Sub-headers could make it easier to find relevant information without reading the complete article.

==Comment==

Not far from a GA (Good Article) rating.

Last edited at 23:50, 20 April 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 16:40, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.news.colostate.edu/Release/6715

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:00, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:34, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:21, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:12, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Racist vandalism of 2020

This is a comment regarding the incident where a sign was vandalized with a racist message and dead bear skin. I feel like this incident is notable enough to be put in the article but I'm opening the discussion for feedback. Cyber the tiger (talk) 00:55, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article issues and classification

Sometimes incremental edits can introduce unforeseen issues. This article shows to have passed the B-class criteria but has some issues.

There are "citation needed" tags from October 2018 and October 2019.
The last three sentences in the "Geography" section are not sourced.
The first and third paragraphs of the "Mountains" subsection are unsourced
The fairly large paragraph in the "Streams and waterfalls" subsection is unsoured.
The prose in the "Historic areas" subsection is unsourced.
The second paragraph in the "Wildflowers" subsection is unsoured.
The "Hiking and trails" subsection has sentences and two paragraphs unsourced.
The first paragraph of the "Sightseeing" subsection is unsourced
The second paragraph in the "Other activities" subsection is unsourced
Around six of the last sentences in the fairly large last paragraph of the "European exploration and settlement and cherokee removal" subsection is unsourced.

The "External links" section has grown to six links. Three, possibly four with consensus, is usually sufficient.

Having enjoyed 560 editors and 146 watchers, I am just leaving these notes for now. -- Otr500 (talk) 06:11, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I plan to eventually address all of these issues, with the ultimate goal of promoting this to a featured article. Unfortunately, I am not as active as I once was, and it is taking a lot longer than I had hoped. But I will get back to this shortly. Bneu2013 (talk) 04:04, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]