Jump to content

Talk:Ha Seung-jin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

He's actually closer to 7'4 and 320 lbs. (7'2 barefoot.)

Well people are usually measured without shoes.

--So I guess that'd make Shaq really 6'11--71.222.48.14 06:36, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate assertion of vandalism by Brianfast made by Downwards

[edit]

Brianfast wrote the following which was deleted as "vandalism" by Downwards

"Ha returned to the Blazer's summer league and had gained pounds and was out of shape. He didn't play well in the tournament and he got in a fight with Nedzad Sinanovic in training camp."
"Ha played in just 27 games during the 2005-06 NBA season. He scored 44 points during the whole season; making him one of the most unproductive players ever. Ha is widely considered the worst player in the NBA."

Whatever the pros and cons of including this material in this article, this was a good faith edit and not vandalism. It is supported by verifiable sources.
From the Oregonian:

Oregonian article: Sinanovic fight/Ha out of shape (from Google's cache)
Alternate link quoting Oregonian article above

From the NBA's web site:

Ha Seung-Jin's stats


--A. B. 07:36, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-neutral point-of-views are not allowed. Read the rules/guidelines. Cheers. --Downwards 22:43, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Read the rules/guidelines"

[edit]

Downwards, thanks for suggesting this—here they are:

from Wikipedia:Vandalism#What vandalism is not (official policy):
"NPOV violations The neutral point of view is a difficult policy for many of us to understand, and even Wikipedia veterans occasionally accidentally introduce material which is non-ideal from an NPOV perspective. Indeed, we are all blinded by our beliefs to a greater or lesser extent. While regrettable, this is not vandalism."
"Mistakes Sometimes, users will insert content into an article that is not necessarily accurate, in the belief that it is. By doing so in good faith, they are trying to contribute to the encyclopedia and improve it. If you believe that there is inaccurate information in an article, ensure that it is, and/or discuss its factuality with the user who has submitted it."
from Wikipedia:Ownership of articles#Control of Wikipedia articles (official policy):
"First, there's control of the content. Some contributors feel very possessive about material (be it categories, templates, articles, images or portals) they have donated to this project. Some go so far as to defend them against all intruders ... Its one thing to take an interest in an article that you maintain on your watchlist. Maybe you really are an expert or you just care about the topic a lot. But when this watchfulness crosses a certain line, then youre overdoing it ..."
from Wikipedia:Assume good faith (official policy):
"So, when you can reasonably assume that something is a well-intentioned error, correct it without just reverting it or labeling it as vandalism. When you disagree with someone, remember that they probably believe that they are helping the project. Consider using talk pages to explain yourself, and give others the opportunity to do the same. This can avoid misunderstandings and prevent problems from escalating. Especially, remember to be patient with newcomers, who will be unfamiliar with Wikipedias culture and rules."

As you would say, Cheers. --A. B. 23:45, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ha Seung-jin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:01, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]