Talk:Raja Ampat–South Halmahera languages
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Halmahera Sea languages)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 11 January 2024
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: move the page to Raja Ampat–South Halmahera languages at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 05:07, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Halmahera Sea languages → Raja Ampat-South Halmahera languages – The name 'Raja Ampat-South Halmahera' is standard for this language branch (e.g. https://glottolog.org/resource/languoid/id/raja1255). This move is blocked, for reasons I don't understand. Squishtavia (talk) 18:58, 11 January 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. — Amakuru (talk) 21:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support. "Raja Ampat-South Halmahera" (RASH) is the term generally used for this subgroup in sources about South Halmahera–West New Guinea (SHWNG) languages, including the very sources cited in this article. I'm not aware of any specialist source that actually uses "Halmahera Sea languages", and the few non-specialist sources that use it are most probably cases of WP:CITOGENESIS. –Austronesier (talk) 20:37, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Indonesia has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:11, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Languages has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:12, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Rather than a hyphen it should be should be Raja Ampat–South Halmahera languages with an n dash. See generally MOS:ENBETWEEN. SilverLocust 🃏 💬 21:41, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yup, our MOS recommend this, so my support !vote includes this option too. –Austronesier (talk) 23:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.