Talk:Hard to Love (Blackpink song)
Hard to Love (Blackpink song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 8, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
This page was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 17 November 2022. The result of the discussion was retarget. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 1 January 2023
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved as requested. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:43, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Hard to Love (Rosé song) → Hard to Love (Blackpink song) – The song is credited with Blackpink as the artist. Examples of similar songs credited to a group with one member's vocals are Epiphany (BTS song) and Euphoria (BTS song). Flabshoe1 (talk) 23:41, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Hard to Love (Blackpink song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Lililolol (talk · contribs) 18:30, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Royiswariii (talk · contribs) 12:04, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | the phrase Meanwhile, 'On the Ground' peaked...could rephrase and clearer flow. In, The sentence | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | per 1a comment. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | looks good. | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | looks good. | |
2c. it contains no original research. | looks good. | |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | there is a little copyvio detected by Earwig's, about 26.5%. Although, it wasn't concerning but I'm recommend to change a little bit too, target: 15% below. Check it on Copyright vio detector. | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
In, | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Where's the album cover? add a non-free album cover.
There is no other cover so considered as passed. Royiswariii Talk! 03:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC) | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. | Hold this until Lililolol addresses all what i suggested or Recommended. Royiswariii Talk! 15:04, 28 October 2024 (UTC) (GA Reviewer) |
- @Royiswariii everything is finished except for the album cover. Since the song isn’t a single, it doesn’t have its own cover. Lililolol (talk) 17:06, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Lililolol, you might want to ask for a second opinion on this review, as the reviewer has been indefinitely blocked for account sharing. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 10:38, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Lililolol!
- I'm apologize for taking too long on this but I will review again if have a changes. Thanks! Royiswariii Talk! 02:39, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Lililolol, you might want to ask for a second opinion on this review, as the reviewer has been indefinitely blocked for account sharing. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 10:38, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
GA Reviewer Comment: Hello again,Lililolol! I checked all what the changes and it appears all my suggestions and recommendations has completed, This article are now on Good Article. You may now nominate this on DYK or if you want to higher, go on FA. But I recommend to more expanded this on peer review. If you are not statisfied on this review, you can reassessment on this review. Thanks! Royiswariii Talk! 03:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Music good articles
- GA-Class song articles
- GA-Class Pop music articles
- Low-importance Pop music articles
- Pop music articles
- GA-Class Korea-related articles
- Low-importance Korea-related articles
- WikiProject Korea popular culture working group
- WikiProject Korea articles
- GA-Class Women in music articles
- Low-importance Women in music articles
- WikiProject Women in Music articles