Talk:High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Importance rating
[edit]Until we know more about the scope of the suit, and how it affects the economy of cali, we cannot give it a high rating for the cali/sfba projects. this needs a lot more information, aside from its rating.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:27, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Title
[edit]This isn't a proper noun or official/formal title, so shouldn't the article title be lower case (High-tech employee antitrust litigation)?--ukexpat (talk) 20:35, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- There's no magic formula to what makes something a proper noun, but to me High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation is, in the appropriate context, perfectly acceptable as a proper noun in the same way that other borderline examples like "Cuban Missile Crisis" are acceptable proper nouns. Rolf H Nelson (talk) 02:33, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
'Intel' Frame
[edit]There is a frame with information on Intel corporation at the bottom of this article. It appears out of place and unrelated to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.143.229.211 (talk) 07:43, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- C-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
- Low-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
- San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- C-Class Apple Inc. articles
- Low-importance Apple Inc. articles
- WikiProject Apple Inc. articles