Talk:History of the St. Louis Cardinals (1990–present)

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject St. Louis Cardinals (assessed as Top-importance).

St. Louis Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject St. Louis, a project to build and improve articles related to St. Louis and the surrounding metropolitan area. We invite you to join the project and contribute to the discussion.St. LouisWikipedia:WikiProject St. LouisTemplate:WikiProject St. LouisSt. Louis articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reason for the creation of this page[edit]

I want to argue against the deletion of the History of the St. Louis Cardinals (1990-Present) because both the main articles St. Louis Cardinals (SLC) and History of the St. Louis Cardinals pages (HSLC) have become too long. To avert this issue, I propose transforming HSLC into a disambiguation page leading to articles corresponding to different eras and dividing the text to five different pages. Similarly, I propose splitting the History section of the SLC main page into five corresponding sections, inserting links directly to the corresponding historical era pages. I have included this same proposal on Talk:St. Louis Cardinals and Talk:History of the St. Louis Cardinals. Obviously, the 1990-present page is one of the five eras proposed. I hope these changes are not upsetting; I would like to have anyone else's input. Does this have any support? ˜˜˜˜Elcid.ruderico, 28 March 2013

Further: I have shortened the corresponding section on History topic of the SLC page. I would like to leave the HSLC page without these corresponding changes for the time being to gather others' input. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elcid.ruderico (talk • contribs) 17:20, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of the St. Louis Cardinals (1990–present). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090307103022/http://stlouis.cardinals.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20020626&content_id=64644&vkey=news_stl&fext=.jsp&c_id=stl to http://stlouis.cardinals.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20020626&content_id=64644&vkey=news_stl&fext=.jsp&c_id=stl

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:04, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

La Russa[edit]

"La Russa announced his retirement, making him the first manager to end his career with a World Series win..." What do about this now that he is managing again? Say that he would have been the first or scrap it altogether? --Jameboy (talk) 14:15, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]