Jump to content

Talk:Hugo Kołłątaj

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Place of birth

[edit]

Where is this Niecisłowice? Is it a place at all? -- Zz 20:38, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

maybe its wrong; de and as well pl write Dederkały Wielkie as birthplace. de says its totday Welyki Dederkaly in ukraine ...Sicherlich Post 08:37, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. Some sources seem to attribute his place of birth to N., but it seems that this is an incorrect simplification, and more reliable sources indicate he was born in WD., then his family moved to N. Sample source for his birth in DW: [1]. While this online ref has only a so-so reliability (local town's history of page), I am inclined to say they are right when they write "większość źródeł wskazuje na Dederkały Wielkie na Wołyniu" ("majority of sources point to D.W in Volhnynia"). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 05:48, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Name

[edit]

The title of this article on the English wiki seems to contain 2 letters unknown to English. Avalon 07:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can read about those letters at diacritics. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 05:48, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
how is it pronounced? Anonymous

Sources

[edit]

Some PD sources for parsing:

There is probably more, but that should be good enough for the next stage (enriching with details). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 05:48, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Republican or royal

[edit]

I'm not sure how the reader is supposed to interpret "advocated a pro-republican constitutional reform", while ... "in particular...advocated the strengthening of the king's position". Orczar (talk) 04:01, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is Jedruch who writes that HK reforms had "a republican spirit". Lerski notes his support for a stronger royal power. Perhaps we could change "in particular" to "in addition", or such, but the sources support the written assertions. (And is there indeed such a contradiction between a republic and royalty? Looking at republicanism, it all depends on how we define "republic(anism)", and we can define it in such a way that is compatible with hereditary (constitutional) monarchy; and I believe it is in that meaning that the word republican is used by Jedruch). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 04:23, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think both republican spirit and support for stronger royal power were true here, it just sounds like a contradiction. Republicanism could be a more abstract idea, while stronger royal power an achievable (and desirable) reform in this case.Orczar (talk) 04:36, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Right. If you feel you can reword the article to make it sound better, by all means, please do so. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 04:45, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

B-class

[edit]

This article meets the B-class criteria. Confirmed for WP:POLAND by Orczar (talk) 14:23, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relative to Alexandra Kollontai?

[edit]

Was Hugo Kołłątaj - [Гуго Коллонтай] Error: {{Lang-xx}}: text has italic markup (help) - a relative to Alexandra Kollontai - [Олександра Коллонтай] Error: {{Lang-xx}}: text has italic markup (help), [Александра Коллонтай] Error: {{Lang-xx}}: text has italic markup (help) ? --85.76.107.154 (talk) 09:56, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hugo Kołłątaj. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:45, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]