Talk:Internet Control Message Protocol version 6
|WikiProject Computing / Networking||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
This page is for discussion of the article. It is not for dumping a massive (500 kB) alternative version of it. -- RHaworth 18:42, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
A few points:
- Articles in the (Main) namespace are never signed (see ownership of articles). The article's edit history and the "diff" reports to which it links give minute details of who did what to the article.
- Get yourself a user Id (if you don't have one) and always log in before editing.
- You do not sign articles but when contributing to talk pages, you should always sign using ~~~~.
- Never, ever create false signatures such as:
- These could be taken as impersonation - luckily we don't have real users with these names.
-- RHaworth 04:04, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
I repeat: you do not sign article edits. But in the case of this article, I am happy to record here that just about all the edits to date have been done by:
In addition to the two anon's noted above, the class includes:
I do get annoyed at student projects that do not announce themselves. So all praise to you for saying who you are. It is just that you were doing it in the wrong place! -- RHaworth 04:09, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Obsoleted and other ICMP types
Aren't the types #130 to #132 obsolete ? They belong to an obsoleted version of the specs (RFC 1885), so I guess they are (and the article should be edited consequently). Also, there seems to exist some more ICMPv6 message types (see here for instance), and it may be a good thing to update the article in that way (my IPv6 knowledge isn't big enough for me to do it). 126.96.36.199 (talk) 14:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1885.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. -- — CactusWriter | needles 17:28, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Need more explanation about checksum
Section "checksum" seems preplexing, at least to me. I had a hard time figuring out how "1's complement summation" is performed. Though I know what 1's complement is, "1's complement summation" is new to me. And there is no article for it on Wikipedia, it there? I did not get the correct until I found another webpage explainning "1's complement summation".