Talk:Ida Presti

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Um, Ida Presti and Alexandre Lagoya are certainly respected as classical guitarists, but to say without qualification that Ida Presti is the greatest performer in history is absurd. This page urgently needs a total overhaul by someone with knowledge of these two guitarists, or it should be deleed. 88/rosette/88 05:42, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quite right. Bream was about 9 years younger than Presti, so it seems rather unlikely he would have been in a position to comment on her musical ablity when she was in her teens. --20.133.0.13 (talk) 15:33, 13 February 2015 (UTC){David Brooke)[reply]

It's not just Alice Artzt's opinion, it's that of many other people in a position to judge: see, for instance, this interview with John W. Duarte, who knew and composed for both Segovia and the Presti/Lagoya duo.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Da_YFGYs-k8

In short, it's certainly not the only opinion, but neither is it absurd. Paul Magnussen (talk) 20:02, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly we find ubiquitous quotes from both Segovia & Bream - stating plainly that she needed no lessons from them, even when she was very young (teenager). So if the two globally acknowledged best guitarists of the twentieth century say she was already at their level, then where does that place her? Of course ratings are subjective; but when the best say she was at their level, why then she was. Why delete the entry? It stands, not on its own, but on the marvelous Ida's merits. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.255.144.77 (talk) 14:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Angelo Gilardino (a composer who knew both Presti and Segovia) wrote the following on the classical guitar newsgroup on Saturday, May 22, 2004 9:18 PM:

"She was the greatest firstly and simply in terms of her skills with the instrument: she could do with fingers things that no other guitarist could do. Her hands were phisically "different" (by nature and for having been manipulated by her father since when she was a baby). She produced the loudest, roundest, fullest, tone ever heard: only Lagoya - since when they met and formed the duo - could match her, and only in certain situations. The tones she produced in certain recordings of the duo ("Goyescas" by Granados, just to give an instance, but one could add many other examples) is the best tone I ever heard from a guitarist - and I listened to all of them who gave concerts after my birth - and she could produce a variety of tones, with a correspondent amplitude of dynamic range, that nobody else has matched so far. She could play a sort of "legato" unique to her playing, and to nobody else's playing. Her vibrato - still documented in the duo recordings, take for example the "Adagio" by Albinoni-Giazotto - is still above anybody else's possibilities. She was - simply - unmistakable. I never heard a wrong note from her. Jack Duarte, who was a strict friend of hers, can witness that in the hundred times he listened to her practicing, he never heard one single mistake from her. Her virtuosity - a stunning one - has been matched by several players nowadays, but at which price, in terms of sound, expression, etc.? Consider that, after her severe training during her childhood, she did not practice very much, her life being spent mainly in travels and concerts... But all of this prodigy was serving the most important purpose: she was a marvelous musician, with a direct, immediate, unabriged vision of the music. Her drawing rhythms, melodies, voices in counterpoint, chords, was simply perfect. She played so well, that you couldn't realize she played well, because you received the music in such an accomplished way that you were allowed to forget she was playing an instrument, and that she was skilled. Her skills disappeared with her doing the music. Her fellows, in the heavens of 20th century interpreters, are to be sought outside guitarists: I would say Dinu Lipatti, and only a few other ones."

Are you satisified now? Paul Magnussen (talk) 17:56, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ida Presti. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080513090804/http://www.pavilionrecords.com/ to http://www.pavilionrecords.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]